Tolerability of loteprednol/tobramycin versus dexamethasone/tobramycin in healthy volunteers: results of a 4-week, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study

被引:6
作者
Bartlett, Jimmy D. [1 ]
Holland, Edward J. [2 ]
Usner, Dale W. [3 ]
Paterno, Michael R. [3 ]
Comstock, Timothy L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Sch Optometry, Dept Optometry, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Cincinnati Eye Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Bausch & Lomb Inc, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
dexamethasone; ester steroid; ketone steroid; loteprednol etabonate; ocular inflammation; tobramycin;
D O I
10.1185/03007990802231981
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the ocular comfort and tolerability of loteprednol etabonate 0.5%/tobramycin 0.3% (LE/T; Zylet*) with dexamethasone 0.1%/tobramycin 0.3% (DM/T; TobraDex) in healthy volunteers. Research design and methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study, healthy volunteers (n = 306) were randomized to receive LE/T or DM/T four times per day for 28 days. Subjects recorded subjective ratings for seven comfort/tolerability parameters using an electronic patient diary (EPD). The primary end-point was the difference at week 4 from the ratings of an artificial tear at baseline in comfort/tolerability parameters between treatment groups, using a noninferiority paradigm. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 00532961. Results: The 97.5% confidence intervals for the lower bound were within -10 for all of the seven comfort/tolerability parameters evaluated (pain, stinging/burning, irritation, itchiness, foreign-body sensation, dryness, and light sensitivity). Secondary analysis revealed small but significant within-treatment differences in pain favoring LE/T over tears and in light sensitivity favoring tears over DM/T (p < 10.01). Small between-treatment differences in the changes from baseline tear ratings to individual study visits favored LE/T for pain, stinging/burning, irritation, itchiness, foreign-body sensation, and light sensitivity at visit 4 (p <= 0.04); for pain, stinging/burning, and foreign-body sensation at visit 5 (p <= 0.03), and for dryness and light sensitivity at visit 6 (p <= 0.05). Conclusions: LE/T satisfied all conditions of noninferiority to DM/T in comfort and tolerability. Subjects receiving LE/T were more likely to report better ocular comfort/ tolerability ratings relative to baseline artificial tears than subjects receiving DM/T. Limitations: The study population consisted of healthy volunteers,
引用
收藏
页码:2219 / 2227
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] *ALC PHARM LAB INC, 2005, TOBRADEX PRESCR INF
  • [2] BARTLETT JD, 2008, OPHTHALMIC DRUG FACT
  • [3] *BAUSCH LOMB INC, 2005, ZYL PRESCR INF
  • [4] Ophthalmic drug design based on the metabolic activity of the eye: Soft drugs and chemical delivery systems
    Bodor, N
    Buchwald, P
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2005, 7 (04) : E820 - E833
  • [5] Bodor N, 1995, NIDA Res Monogr, V154, P1
  • [6] Bodor N, 2000, MED RES REV, V20, P58, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(200001)20:1<58::AID-MED3>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-X
  • [8] Guillon Michel, 2004, Eye Contact Lens, V30, P34, DOI 10.1097/01.ICL.0000101489.13687.9A
  • [9] Effects of loteprednol/tobramycin versus dexamethasone/tobramycin on intraocular pressure in healthy volunteers
    Holland, Edward J.
    Bartlett, Jimmy D.
    Paterno, Michael R.
    Usner, Dale W.
    Comstock, Timothy L.
    [J]. CORNEA, 2008, 27 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [10] Failure to detect systemic levels, and effects of loteprednol etabonate and its metabolite, PJ-91, following chronic ocular administration
    Howes, J
    Novack, GD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 14 (02) : 153 - 158