Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Brucellosis in Ruminants in Dhofar Province in Southern Oman

被引:9
作者
Al-Marzooqi, Waleed [1 ]
Elshafie, Elshafie I. [1 ]
Al-Toobi, AlGhalya [1 ]
Al-Hamrashdi, Abeer [1 ]
Al-Kharousi, Kaadhia [1 ]
El-Tahir, Hatim [2 ]
Jay, Maryne [3 ,4 ]
Corde, Yannick [3 ,4 ]
ElTahir, Yasmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Agr & Marine Sci, Dept Anim & Vet Sci, POB 34, Al Khoud 123, Oman
[2] Minist Agr & Fisheries, Directorate Gen Anim Wealth, POB 567, Muscat 100, Oman
[3] Paris Est Univ Anses, EU OIE FAO, Maisons Alfort, France
[4] Natl Reference Lab Brucellosis, Anim Hlth Lab, Maisons Alfort, France
关键词
SEROLOGICAL TESTS; MIDDLE-EAST; DIAGNOSIS; SULTANATE; PREVALENCE; ANTIBODIES; ELISA;
D O I
10.1155/2022/3176147
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of the present work was to raise awareness of Brucella infection and emphasize the use of serological tests for screening and confirmation of the presence of the infection in different localities in the Dhofar region in the Sultanate of Oman. Methods. A seroprevalence of Brucella infection in naturally infected livestock was undertaken in 50 farms (a total of 434 sera, 207 goats, 84 sheep, 54 cattle, and 89 camels) from different wilayat of the Dhofar region in the southern part of Oman. Rose Bengal (RBT), complement fixation (CFT), and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) tests were used to determine the presence of Brucella antibodies. Statistical analysis (Pearson chi-square, binary logistic regression, and univariate logistic regression) was used to investigate the significance between the prevalence and the categorical risk factors individually, with two or more levels (animal species, animal condition, and or location). Results. Our results show that the overall seroprevalence based on CFT, RBT, and I-ELISA was 3% (13/424, CI: 1.8-5.1%), 4.8% (21/434, CI: 3.1-7.3%), and 8% (35/434, CI: 5.8-10.9%), respectively. The highest seroprevalence was reported in goats (13% (27/207)) and animals from East Jabal (13% (21/161)), whereas the lowest was recorded in camels (3.4% (3/89)) and animals from deserts (1.4% (1/69)). Parameters such as the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) showed that the sensitivity of I-ELISA and CFT based on the RBT test was 61.9% and 57.1%, respectively, whereas the specificity of I-ELISA (94.6%) was less than that of CFT (97.33%). Conclusion. We concluded that three tests are confirmatory for the presence of Brucella infection.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Adam A. M., 2013, Veterinary Research (Pakistan), V6, P5
[2]   Zoonotic Diseases in Oman: Successes, Challenges, and Future Directions [J].
Al Awaidy, Salah ;
Al Hashami, Hilal .
VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2020, 20 (01) :1-9
[3]  
Al-Rawahi A., 2015, THESIS MURDOCH U PER
[4]  
Alton G. G., 1988, Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory.
[5]  
Alton G. G., 1982, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goat Production and Disease, January 10-15, 1982, Tucson, Arizona, USA., P431
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, BRUC HUM AN, P1
[7]   EVALUATION OF ELISA IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC BRUCELLOSIS IN HUMAN-BEINGS [J].
ARAJ, GF ;
LULU, AR ;
MUSTAFA, MY ;
KHATEEB, MI .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1986, 97 (03) :457-469
[8]   The pathogenicity of Brucella suis biovar 4 for bison [J].
Bevins, JS ;
Blake, JE ;
Adams, LG ;
Templeton, JW ;
Morton, JK ;
Davis, DS .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1996, 32 (04) :581-585
[9]   Economic and health burden of brucellosis in Kazakhstan [J].
Charypkhan, Duriya ;
Sultanov, Akhmetzhan A. ;
Ivanov, Nikolay. P. ;
Baramova, Sholpan A. ;
Taitubayev, Mereke. K. ;
Torgerson, Paul R. .
ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 66 (05) :487-494
[10]   An evaluation of serological tests in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in naturally infected cattle in KwaZulu-Natal province in South Africa [J].
Chisi, Songelwayo L. ;
Marageni, Yoanda ;
Naidoo, Prebashni ;
Zulu, Gloria ;
Akol, George W. ;
van Heerden, Henriette .
JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATION, 2017, 88