Left bundle branch area pacing: A promising modality for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:5
作者
Fu, Yuping [1 ]
Liu, Peng [1 ]
Jin, Lingyan [1 ]
Li, Yingqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yudi [1 ]
Qin, Xinghua [2 ]
Zheng, Qiangsun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Cardiol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Life Sci, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2022年 / 9卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; biventricular pacing; conduction system pacing; left bundle branch pacing; HEART-FAILURE; LEAD; ACTIVATION; PLACEMENT; MULTISITE; PERMANENT; PATIENT;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.901046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recognized as the first-line management for patients with heart failure (HF) and conduction disorders. As a conventional mode for delivering CRT, biventricular pacing (BVP) improves cardiac function and reduces HF hospitalizations and mortality, but there are still limitations given the high incidence of a lack of response rates. Alternative pacing methods are needed either for primary or rescue therapy. In recent years, conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as a more physiological pacing modality for simultaneous stimulation of the ventricles, including His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). CSP activates the His-Purkinje system, allowing normal ventricular stimulation. However, HBP is technically challenging with a relatively low success rate, high pacing threshold, and failure to correct distal conduction abnormalities. Therefore, LBBP stands out as a novel ideal physiological pacing modality for CRT. Several non-randomized studies compared the feasibility and safety of LBBP with BVP and concluded that LBBP is superior to BVP for delivering CRT with a narrower QRS and greater improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Concurrently, some studies showed lower and stable pacing thresholds and greater improvement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, as well as better mechanical synchronization and efficiency. LBBP ensures better ventricular electromechanical resynchronization than BVP. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of LBBP, compare LBBP with BVP, and explore the potential of LBBP to serve as an alternative primary therapy to realize cardiac resynchronization.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Abraham, WT
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2006, 48 (04) : 232 - 238
  • [2] Surgically placed left ventricular leads provide similar outcomes to percutaneous leads in patients with failed coronary sinus lead placement
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    LaPar, Damien J.
    Swenson, Brian R.
    Maxwell, Cory D.
    Girotti, Micah E.
    Bergin, James D.
    Kern, John A.
    DiMarco, John P.
    Mahapatra, Srijoy
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2010, 7 (05) : 619 - 625
  • [3] Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice
    Akerstrom, Finn
    Narvaez, Irene
    Puchol, Alberto
    Pachon, Marta
    Martin-Sierra, Cristina
    Rodriguez-Manero, Moises
    Rodriguez-Padial, Luis
    Arias, Miguel A.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (07): : 1161 - 1167
  • [4] Left Ventricular Endocardial Stimulation for Severe Heart Failure
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Derval, Nicolas
    Ploux, Sylvain
    Garrigue, Stephane
    Ritter, Philippe
    Haissaguerre, Michel
    Jais, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (10) : 747 - 753
  • [5] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Implant Technique, Definitions, Outcomes, and Complications
    Cano, Oscar
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 23 (11)
  • [6] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Emerging Therapeutic Approaches
    Chatterjee N.A.
    Heist E.K.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 20 (3)
  • [7] Cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing vs. optimized biventricular pacing with adaptive algorithm in heart failure with left bundle branch block: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study
    Chen, Xueying
    Ye, Yang
    Wang, Zhongkai
    Jin, Qinchun
    Qiu, Zhaohui
    Wang, Jingfeng
    Qin, Shengmei
    Bai, Jin
    Wang, Wei
    Liang, Yixiu
    Chen, Haiyan
    Sheng, Xia
    Gao, Feng
    Zhao, Xianxian
    Fu, Guosheng
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Su, Yangang
    Ge, Junbo
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2022, 24 (05): : 807 - 816
  • [8] Chokesuwattanaskul Ronpichai, 2022, J Innov Card Rhythm Manag, V13, P4933, DOI 10.19102/icrm.2022.130303
  • [9] Left bundle branch pacing compared to left ventricular septal myocardial pacing increases interventricular dyssynchrony but accelerates left ventricular lateral wall depolarization
    Curila, Karol
    Jurak, Pavel
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Prinzen, Frits
    Waldauf, Petr
    Halamek, Josef
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Smisek, Radovan
    Karch, Jakub
    Plesinger, Filip
    Moskal, Pawel
    Susankova, Marketa
    Znojilova, Lucie
    Heckman, Luuk
    Viscor, Ivo
    Vondra, Vlastimil
    Leinveber, Pavel
    Osmancik, Pavel
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (08) : 1281 - 1289
  • [10] Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide
    Daubert, Claude
    Behar, Nathalie
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Mabo, Philippe
    Leclercq, Christophe
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (19) : 1463 - 1472C