Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial

被引:72
作者
Brain, Kate [1 ]
Lifford, Kate J. [1 ]
Carter, Ben [1 ]
Burke, Olivia [1 ]
McRonald, Fiona [2 ]
Devaraj, Anand [3 ]
Hansell, David M. [3 ]
Baldwin, David [4 ]
Duffy, Stephen W. [5 ]
Field, John K. [6 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Publ Hlth England, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Univ Nottingham Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Nottingham, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, London, England
[6] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; FAMILY-HISTORY; PARTICIPATION; HEALTH; ATTITUDES; ENGLAND; ANXIETY; RISK; INEQUALITIES;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208283
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial is a randomised pilot trial of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for individuals at high risk of lung cancer. We assessed the long-term psychosocial impact on individuals participating in the UKLS trial. Methods A random sample of individuals aged 50-75 years was contacted via primary care. High-risk individuals who completed T-0 questionnaires (baseline) were randomised to LDCT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). T-1 questionnaires were sent 2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment. T-2 questionnaires were sent up to 2 years after recruitment. Measures included cancer distress, anxiety, depression and decision satisfaction. Results A total of 4037 high-risk individuals were randomised and they completed T-0 questionnaires (n=2018 intervention, n=2019 control). Cancer distress was higher at T-1 in intervention arm participants who received positive screening results (p <= 0.001), but not at T-2 (p <= 0.04). T-2 anxiety (p <= 0.001) and depression (p <= 0.01) were higher in the control arm, but the absolute differences were small and not clinically relevant. At both time points, fewer control than screened participants were satisfied with their decision to participate in UKLS (p <= 0.001). Regardless of trial allocation, cancer distress was higher in women (p <= 0.01), participants aged <= 65 years (p <= 0.001), current smokers (p <= 0.001), those with lung cancer experience (p=0.001) and those recruited from the Liverpool area (p <= 0.001). Conclusion Lung cancer screening using LDCT appears to have no clinically significant long-term psychosocial impact on high-risk participants. Strategies for engaging and supporting underserved groups are the key to implement routine lung cancer screening in the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1005
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Psychosocial consequences of allocation to lung cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Aggestrup, Louise Mosborg ;
Hestbech, Mie Sara ;
Siersma, Volkert ;
Pedersen, Jesper Hoist ;
Brodersen, John .
BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (02)
[3]   Barriers to uptake among high-risk individuals declining participation in lung cancer screening: a mixed methods analysis of the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial [J].
Ali, Noor ;
Lifford, Kate J. ;
Carter, Ben ;
McRonald, Fiona ;
Yadegarfar, Ghasem ;
Baldwin, David R. ;
Weller, David ;
Hansell, David M. ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Field, John K. ;
Brain, Kate .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (07)
[4]  
[Anonymous], LUNG CANC STAT
[5]   The evolution of worry after breast cancer risk assessment: 6-year follow-up of the TRACE study cohort [J].
Brain, K. ;
Parsons, E. ;
Bennett, P. ;
Cannings-John, R. ;
Hood, K. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 20 (09) :984-991
[6]   Anxiety, Fear of Cancer, and Perceived Risk of Cancer following Lung Cancer Screening [J].
Byrne, Margaret M. ;
Weissfeld, Joel ;
Roberts, Mark S. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (06) :917-925
[7]  
Cancer Research UK, TOB STAT
[8]   Diagnosed with breast cancer while on a family history screening programme: an exploratory qualitative study [J].
Clements, A. ;
Henderson, B. J. ;
Tyndel, S. ;
Evans, G. ;
Brain, K. ;
Austoker, J. ;
Watson, E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2008, 17 (03) :245-252
[9]   UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening [J].
Field, J. K. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Baldwin, D. R. ;
Whynes, D. K. ;
Devaraj, A. ;
Brain, K. E. ;
Eisen, T. ;
Gosney, J. ;
Green, B. A. ;
Holemans, J. A. ;
Kavanagh, T. ;
Kerr, K. M. ;
Ledson, M. ;
Lifford, K. J. ;
McRonald, F. E. ;
Nair, A. ;
Page, R. D. ;
Parmar, M. K. B. ;
Rassl, D. M. ;
Rintoul, R. C. ;
Screaton, N. J. ;
Wald, N. J. ;
Weller, D. ;
Williamson, P. R. ;
Yadegarfar, G. ;
Hansell, D. M. .
THORAX, 2016, 71 (02) :161-170
[10]   European Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trials: Post NLST [J].
Field, John K. ;
van Klaveren, Rob ;
Pedersen, Jesper H. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Paci, Eugino ;
Becker, Nikolauss ;
Infante, Maurizo ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (05) :280-286