The energy efficiency of oil sands extraction: Energy return ratios from 1970 to 2010

被引:55
作者
Brandt, Adam R. [1 ]
Englander, Jacob [1 ]
Bharadwaj, Sharad [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Energy return on investment; Oil sands; Net energy returns; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NET ENERGY; UNITED-STATES; GLOBAL OIL; INVESTMENT; YIELD; EROI;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.080
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
It has been argued that the oil sands industry is not energy efficient: comparatively large energy inputs are required per unit of energy output from oil sands operations. Unfortunately, quantitative work to date in this area has suffered from poor data availability and uncertain methods. We apply a new methodology and new dataset to compute ERRS (energy return ratios) for the oil sands industry. We collected monthly oil sands energy consumption and output data from 1970 to 2010. Current oil sands operations have mine mouth NERs (net energy returns) of about 6 GJ output per GJ of energy consumed and point of use energy returns of about 3 GJ/GJ. Long-term trends show oil sands operations becoming significantly more efficient: point of use NER increased from about 1 GJ/GJ in 1970 to 3 GJ/GJ in 2010. These energy returns are lower than those observed in historical conventional oil operations, but low energy returns are not likely to hinder development of oil sands operations due to the large resource in place and the ability for largely self-fueled pathways to return significant amounts of energy to society for every unit of external energy supplied. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 702
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900-1998
    Ayres, RU
    Ayres, LW
    Warr, B
    [J]. ENERGY, 2003, 28 (03) : 219 - 273
  • [2] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Current Oil Sands Technologies: Surface Mining and In Situ Applications
    Bergerson, Joule A.
    Kofoworola, Oyeshola
    Charpentier, Alex D.
    Sleep, Sylvia
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (14) : 7865 - 7874
  • [3] Converting oil shale to liquid fuels: Energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions of the Shell in situ conversion process
    Brandt, Adam R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (19) : 7489 - 7495
  • [4] Variability and Uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment Models for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Canadian Oil Sands Production
    Brandt, Adam R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 1253 - 1261
  • [5] Oil Depletion and the Energy Efficiency of Oil Production: The Case of California
    Brandt, Adam R.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (10) : 1833 - 1854
  • [6] A General Mathematical Framework for Calculating Systems-Scale Efficiency of Energy Extraction and Conversion: Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Other Energy Return Ratios
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Dale, Michael
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2011, 4 (08): : 1211 - 1245
  • [7] Converting Oil Shale to Liquid Fuels with the Alberta Taciuk Processor: Energy Inputs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Brandt, Adam R.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (12) : 6253 - 6258
  • [8] CAPP, 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [9] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Current Oil Sands Technologies: GHOST Model Development and Illustrative Application
    Charpentier, Alex D.
    Kofoworola, Oyeshola
    Bergerson, Joule A.
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (21) : 9393 - 9404
  • [10] Understanding the Canadian oil sands industry's greenhouse gas emissions
    Charpentier, Alex D.
    Bergerson, Joule A.
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 4 (01):