Effect of processing conditions on yield and quality of hydraulically expressed palm oil

被引:0
作者
Owolarafe, O. K. [1 ]
Taiwo, E. A. [2 ]
Oke, O. O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, Dept Agr Engn, Ife, Nigeria
[2] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Ife, Nigeria
关键词
palm fruit; processing-operations; oil yield; quality; optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An investigation was carried out oil the effect of processing conditions such as sterilization time, digestion time and expression pressure on the yield and quality of hydraulically expressed crude palm oil. Palm fruits were collected, cleaned and sterilized for 30, 60 and 90 min. The fruits were then digested for 3, 5, and 10 min and later pressed with pressures of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 MPa for constant pressing time of 5 min. The results show that increase in sterilization time from 30 to 90 min, digestion time from 3 to 10 min and expression pressure from 0.5 to 1.5 MPa generally increased oil yield. The highest yield of oil of 35% was obtained at the sterilization time of 60 min, digestion time of 10 min and expression pressure of 1 MPa. The solid impurity content of the oil (as a measure of crude palm oil quality) at 30 and 90 min sterilization was observed to be generally high. The solid impurity at 60 min sterilization time was, however, observed to be low. Increase in digestion time and expression pressure increased the solid impurity at all sterilization times.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 352
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Extruding Parameters on Soybean Oil Yield of Enzyme-assisted Aqueous Extraction Processing
    Li, Yang
    Jiang, Lianzhou
    Qiao, Guohua
    MANUFACTURING PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS, PTS 1-2, 2011, 148-149 : 7 - +
  • [32] Effect of Preprocessing Olive Storage Conditions on Virgin Olive Oil Quality and Composition
    Inarejos-Garcia, Antonio M.
    Gomez-Rico, Aurora
    Desamparados Salvador, M.
    Fregapane, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2010, 58 (08) : 4858 - 4865
  • [33] Effect of pre-treatment and oil popping conditions on quinoa popping quality
    Deepak, S.
    Shivaswamy, M. S.
    Sharmila, T.
    Maheswari, M.
    ACTA ALIMENTARIA, 2022, 51 (01) : 93 - 104
  • [34] Comparison of oil yield and quality obtained by different extraction procedures from salmon (Salmo salar) processing byproducts
    Glowacz-Rozynska, Agnieszka
    Tynek, Maria
    Malinowska-Panczyk, Edyta
    Martysiak-Zurowska, Dorota
    Pawlowicz, Roman
    Kolodziejska, Ilona
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LIPID SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 118 (11) : 1759 - 1767
  • [35] Effect of repeated frying on the viscosity, density and dynamic interfacial tension of palm and olive oil
    Kalogianni, E. P.
    Karapantsios, T. D.
    Miller, R.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2011, 105 (01) : 169 - 179
  • [36] Effect of potassium fertilization on processing grade tuber yield and quality parameters in potato (Solanum tuberosum)
    Kumar, P
    Pandey, SK
    Singh, SV
    Rawal, S
    Kumar, D
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2004, 74 (04): : 177 - 179
  • [37] Oil Quality Analysis Using Image Processing
    Daimiwal, Nivedita
    Shriram, Revati
    Shinde, Harish
    Kulkarni, Radhika
    Galewad, Apeksha
    SMART SENSORS MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, CISCON 2021, 2023, 957 : 129 - 137
  • [38] Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Palm Oil Processing Residues and Their Application as Antioxidants
    Tsouko, Erminda
    Alexandri, Maria
    Fernandes, Keysson Vieira
    Guimaraes Freire, Denise Maria
    Mallouchos, Athanasios
    Koutinas, Apostolis A.
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 57 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [39] Volatile profiles of extra virgin olive oil, olive pomace oil, soybean oil and palm oil in different heating conditions
    Giuffre, A. M.
    Capocasale, M.
    Macri, R.
    Caracciolo, M.
    Zappia, C.
    Poiana, M.
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 117
  • [40] EVALUATION OF PALM OIL QUALITY - CORRELATING SENSORY WITH CHEMICAL-ANALYSES
    IDRIS, NA
    ABDULLAH, A
    HALIM, AH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1992, 69 (03) : 272 - 275