Using Support Vector Machines to develop pedotransfer functions for water retention of soils in Poland

被引:118
作者
Lamorski, K. [2 ]
Pachepsky, Y. [1 ]
Slawihski, C. [2 ]
Walczak, R. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Environm Microbial Safety Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Agrophys, PL-20236 Lublin, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2007.0280N
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs), which estimate soil hydraulic parameters from easy, to measure soil properties, are an important data Source for hydrologic modeling. Recently artificial neural networks (ANNs) have become the tool of choice in PTF development. Recent developments in machine learning methods include the growing research and application of the alternative data-driven method called Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Support Vector Machines have gained Popularity in many traditionally ANN dominated fields. Using the SVM eliminates the local minimum issue-the minimum found is always the global one. The objective of this work was to see whethers using the SVM to develop PTFs may have some advantages compared with the ANN. We have used the Sod Profiles Bank of Polish Mineral Soils that includes hydraulic properties for 806 soil samples taken from 290 soil profiles. This database was repeatedly randomly split into training and testing data sets, and both SVMs and ANNs were trained and tested for each split with bulk density, sand and clay as input variables, and water contents at 11 soil water potentials as the output variables. The PTF performance was evaluated by using die rest datasets to compute the coefficient of determination, the root-mean-squared error, and the slope and the intercept of the linear regression "predicted vs. measured water contents." The three-parameter SVMs performed mostly better than or with the same accuracy as the eleven-parameter ANNs. The advantage of SVM was more pronounced at soil matric potentials where larger relative errors have been encountered and the correlation between predicted and measured soil water contents was lower. It is worthwhile to consider SVM as a tool to develop PTF.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1247
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Meta learning evolutionary artificial neural networks [J].
Abraham, A .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2004, 56 (1-4) :1-38
[2]   ESTIMATING SOIL-WATER CHARACTERISTICS FROM SIMPLER PROPERTIES OR LIMITED DATA [J].
AHUJA, LR ;
NANEY, JW ;
WILLIAMS, RD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (05) :1100-1105
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 5 ANN WORKSH COMP
[4]   Multi-time scale stream flow predictions: The support vector machines approach [J].
Asefa, T ;
Kemblowski, M ;
McKee, M ;
Khalil, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 318 (1-4) :7-16
[5]   ON THE PROBLEM OF LOCAL MINIMA IN RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
BIANCHINI, M ;
GORI, M ;
MAGGINI, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 5 (02) :167-172
[6]   Point and parameter pedotransfer functions for water retention predictions for Danish soils [J].
Borgesen, CD ;
Schaap, MG .
GEODERMA, 2005, 127 (1-2) :154-167
[7]  
CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1022627411411
[8]  
Cristianini N., 2000, Intelligent Data Analysis: An Introduction
[9]   Model induction with support vector machines: Introduction and applications [J].
Dibike, YB ;
Velickov, S ;
Solomatine, D ;
Abbott, MB .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 15 (03) :208-216
[10]  
DROZD J, 1998, SOIL SCI MINERALOGY