Is Exploratory Search Different? A Comparison of Information Search Behavior for Exploratory and Lookup Tasks

被引:96
作者
Athukorala, Kumaripaba [1 ]
Glowacka, Dorota [1 ]
Jacucci, Giulio [1 ]
Oulasvirta, Antti [2 ]
Vreeken, Jilles [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Comp Sci, Helsinki Inst Informat Technol, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Dept Commun & Networking, Espoo, Finland
[3] Max Planck Inst Informat, Saarbrucken, Germany
[4] Univ Saarland, Saarbrucken, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
WEB; SEEKING; STRATEGIES; EXPERIENCE; NOVICES; EXPERTS; USER;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23617
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Exploratory search is an increasingly important activity yet challenging for users. Although there exists an ample amount of research into understanding exploration, most of the major information retrieval (IR) systems do not provide tailored and adaptive support for such tasks. One reason is the lack of empirical knowledge on how to distinguish exploratory and lookup search behaviors in IR systems. The goal of this article is to investigate how to separate the 2 types of tasks in an IR system using easily measurable behaviors. In this article, we first review characteristics of exploratory search behavior. We then report on a controlled study of 6 search tasks with 3 exploratory-comparison, knowledge acquisition, planning-and 3 lookup tasks-fact-finding, navigational, question answering. The results are encouraging, showing that IR systems can distinguish the 2 search categories in the course of a search session. The most distinctive indicators that characterize exploratory search behaviors are query length, maximum scroll depth, and task completion time. However, 2 tasks are borderline and exhibit mixed characteristics. We assess the applicability of this finding by reporting on several classification experiments. Our results have valuable implications for designing tailored and adaptive IR systems.
引用
收藏
页码:2635 / 2651
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Agichtein E., 2006, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P19, DOI 10.1145/1148170.1148177
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DATA MINING
[3]  
[Anonymous], P S HUM COMP INT INF
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, P 2 INT C WEB INF SY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '07), DOI DOI 10.1145/1242572.1242576
[6]  
Athukorala K., 2013, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V50, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/MEET.14505001041
[7]  
Athukorala K., 2014, Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, P819, DOI [10.1145/2661829.2661904, DOI 10.1145/2661829.2661904]
[8]   Modeling successful performance in Web searching [J].
Aula, Anne ;
Nordhausen, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (12) :1678-1693
[9]  
Aula A, 2010, CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, P35
[10]  
Belkin Nicholas J., 2008, SIGIR Forum, V42, P47, DOI 10.1145/1394251.1394261