Mapping spatio-temporal variation of grassland quantity and quality using MERIS data and the PROSAIL model

被引:106
作者
Si, Yali [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schlerf, Martin [4 ]
Zurita-Milla, Raul [3 ]
Skidmore, Andrew [3 ]
Wang, Tiejun [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Earth Syst Modeling, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Earth Syst Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AA Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Rech Publ, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
关键词
Grassland; Quantity; Quality; LAI; Chlorophyll; MERIS; PROSAIL; LUT; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; VEGETATION INDEXES; CANOPY VARIABLES; REFLECTANCE; LEAF; LAI; INVERSION; RETRIEVAL; VALIDATION; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate estimates of the quantity and quality of grasslands, as they vary in space and time and from regional to global scales, furthers our understanding of grassland ecosystems. The Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) is a promising sensor for measuring and monitoring grasslands due to its high spectral resolution, medium spatial resolution and a two- to three-day repeat cycle. However, thus far the multi-biome MERIS land products have limited consistency with in-situ measurements of leaf area index (LAI), while the multi-biome canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) has not been validated yet with in-situ data. This study proposes a single-biome approach to estimate grassland LAI (a surrogate of grass quantity) and leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) and CCC (surrogates of grass quality) using the inversion of the PROSAIL model and MERIS reflectance. Both multi-biome and single-biome approaches were validated using two-season in-situ data sets and the temporal consistency was analyzed using time-series of MERIS data. The single-biome approach showed a consistently better performance for estimating LAI (R-2 = 0.70, root mean square error (RMSE) = 1.02, normalized RMSE (NRMSE) = 16%) and CCC (R-2 = 0.61, RMSE = 0.36, NRMSE = 23%) compared with the multi-biome approach (LAI: R-2 = 0.36, RMSE = 1.77, NRMSE = 28%; CCC: R-2 = 0.47, RMSE = 1.33, NRMSE = 84%). However, both single-biome and multi-biome approaches failed to retrieve LCC. The multi-biome LAI was overestimated at lower LAI values (<2) and saturated at higher LAI values (>= 4), and the multi-biome CCC was consistently overestimated through the whole data range. Similar temporal trajectories of grassland LAI and CCC estimates were observed using these two approaches, but the multi-biome trajectory consistently produced larger values than the single-biome trajectory. The spatio-temporal variation of grassland LAI and CCC estimated by the single-biome approach was shown to be closely associated with agricultural practices. Our results underline the potential of mapping grassland LAI and CCC using the PROSAIL model and MERIS satellite data. Crown Copyright (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 425
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Biophysical and biochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance [J].
Asner, GP .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 64 (03) :234-253
[2]   Object-based retrieval of biophysical canopy variables using artificial neural nets and radiative transfer models [J].
Atzberger, C .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 93 (1-2) :53-67
[3]  
Atzberger C., 2003, Proc. 3rd EARSeL workshop on imaging spectroscopy, P473
[4]   Neural network estimation of LAI, fAPAR, fCover and LAIxCab, from top of canopy MERIS reflectance data:: Principles and validation [J].
Bacour, C. ;
Baret, F. ;
Beal, D. ;
Weiss, M. ;
Pavageau, K. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 105 (04) :313-325
[5]   POTENTIALS AND LIMITS OF VEGETATION INDEXES FOR LAI AND APAR ASSESSMENT [J].
BARET, F ;
GUYOT, G .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 35 (2-3) :161-173
[6]  
Baret F., 2000, Aspects of Applied Biology, P71
[7]  
Baret F., 2006, REPORT VALIDATION ME
[8]   Non-destructive estimation of wheat leaf chlorophyll content from hyperspectral measurements through analytical model inversion [J].
Botha, E. J. ;
Leblon, B. ;
Zebarth, B. J. ;
Watmough, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 31 (07) :1679-1697
[9]   EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS FOR RADIATION IN PLANT CANOPIES CALCULATED USING AN ELLIPSOIDAL INCLINATION ANGLE DISTRIBUTION [J].
CAMPBELL, GS .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1986, 36 (04) :317-321
[10]   Comparison and evaluation of Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer leaf area index products across a range of land use [J].
Canisius, Francis ;
Fernandes, Richard ;
Chen, Jing .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (05) :950-960