RETRACTED: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer (Retracted Article)

被引:9
作者
Lu, DongHao [1 ]
Liu, Zhihong [2 ]
Shi, Gang [1 ]
Liu, Dan [3 ]
Zhou, Xiaoyan [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, W China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, W China Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, W China Sch Med, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2012年 / 01期
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LAPAROTOMY; TRACHELECTOMY; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD008640.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Robotic surgery is the latest innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery. Robotic surgical systems have been used to perform surgery for endometrial, cervical cancer and ovarian cancer. There is mounting evidence which demonstrates the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for gynaecological oncology. Objectives To evaluate the evidence for and against robotic assisted surgery in gynaecological cancer. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to July 2010) and citation lists of relevant publications. Selection criteria All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer to laparoscopic or open surgical procedures as well as RCTs comparing different types of robotic assistants. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion. No RCTs were identified, therefore data collection and analysis could not be performed. Main results No studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. Controlled clinical trials (CCTs) are summarised and analysed, but are not discussed in the main body of the review as they present a high risk of bias. Authors' conclusions Well-designed RCTs are required as only low quality evidence from CCTs is available. These studies support the use of robotic assisted surgery for endometrial cancer and cervical cancer, but these findings present a high risk of bias.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs [J].
Advincula, Arnold P. ;
Xu, Xiao ;
Goudeau, Suntrea ;
Ransom, Scott B. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) :698-705
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN UROLOGY
[3]  
[Anonymous], Cancer Facts and Figures 2009
[4]   Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques [J].
Bell, Maria C. ;
Torgerson, Jenny ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha ;
Suttle, Allison Wierda ;
Hunt, Sharon .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :407-411
[5]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[6]   A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :360.e1-360.e9
[7]   LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - REPORT OF 82 CASES AND COMPARISON WITH ABDOMINAL AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
BOIKE, GM ;
ELFSTRAND, EP ;
DELPRIORE, G ;
SCHUMOCK, D ;
HOLLEY, HS ;
LURAIN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (06) :1690-1701
[8]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265
[9]   Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center [J].
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel ;
Adams, Sarah ;
Bhat, Suneel B. ;
Randall, Thomas C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :224-228
[10]   Robotics and Gynecologic Oncology: Review of the Literature [J].
Cho, Jennifer E. ;
Nezhat, Farr R. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) :669-681