Ensemble Kalman filter versus ensemble smoother for assessing hydraulic conductivity via tracer test data assimilation

被引:61
作者
Crestani, E. [1 ]
Camporese, M. [1 ]
Bau, D. [2 ]
Salandin, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Padua, Italy
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
TRANSPORT; FLOW; PARAMETERS; DISPERSION; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/hess-17-1517-2013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Estimating the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity K in natural aquifers is important for predicting the transport of dissolved compounds. Especially in the non-reactive case, the plume evolution is mainly controlled by the heterogeneity of K. At the local scale, the spatial distribution of K can be inferred by combining the Lagrangian formulation of the transport with a Kalman-filter-based technique and assimilating a sequence of time-lapse concentration C measurements, which, for example, can be evaluated on site through the application of a geophysical method. The objective of this work is to compare the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and the ensemble smoother (ES) capabilities to retrieve the hydraulic conductivity spatial distribution in a groundwater flow and transport modeling framework. The application refers to a two-dimensional synthetic aquifer in which a tracer test is simulated. Moreover, since Kalman-filter-based methods are optimal only if each of the involved variables fit to a Gaussian probability density function (pdf) and since this condition may not be met by some of the flow and transport state variables, issues related to the non-Gaussianity of the variables are analyzed and different transformation of the pdfs are considered in order to evaluate their influence on the performance of the methods. The results show that the EnKF reproduces with good accuracy the hydraulic conductivity field, outperforming the ES regardless of the pdf of the concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1531
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ABABOU R, 1989, TRANSPORT POROUS MED, V4, P549, DOI 10.1007/BF00223627
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, FLOW TRANSPORT POROU, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-75015-1
[3]   Ensemble smoother assimilation of hydraulic head and return flow data to estimate hydraulic conductivity distribution [J].
Bailey, R. ;
Bau, D. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
[4]   Estimating geostatistical parameters and spatially-variable hydraulic conductivity within a catchment system using an ensemble smoother [J].
Bailey, R. T. ;
Bau, D. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :287-304
[5]   Optimal design of pump-and-treat systems under uncertain hydraulic conductivity and plume distribution [J].
Bau, Domenico A. ;
Mayer, Alex S. .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2008, 100 (1-2) :30-46
[6]   Characterization of mixing errors in a coupled physical biogeochemical model of the North Atlantic: implications for nonlinear estimation using Gaussian anamorphosis [J].
Beal, D. ;
Brasseur, P. ;
Brankart, J. -M. ;
Ourmieres, Y. ;
Verron, J. .
OCEAN SCIENCE, 2010, 6 (01) :247-262
[7]   EULERIAN-LAGRANGIAN APPROACH FOR MODELING OF FLOW AND TRANSPORT IN HETEROGENEOUS GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS [J].
BELLIN, A ;
RUBIN, Y ;
RINALDO, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1994, 30 (11) :2913-2924
[8]   SIMULATION OF DISPERSION IN HETEROGENEOUS POROUS FORMATIONS - STATISTICS, 1ST-ORDER THEORIES, CONVERGENCE OF COMPUTATIONS [J].
BELLIN, A ;
SALANDIN, P ;
RINALDO, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (09) :2211-2227
[9]   FIELD-STUDY OF DISPERSION IN A HETEROGENEOUS AQUIFER .1. OVERVIEW AND SITE DESCRIPTION [J].
BOGGS, JM ;
YOUNG, SC ;
BEARD, LM ;
GELHAR, LW ;
REHFELDT, KR ;
ADAMS, EE .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (12) :3281-3291
[10]   Assessment of local hydraulic properties from electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of a three-dimensional synthetic tracer test experiment [J].
Camporese, M. ;
Cassiani, G. ;
Deiana, R. ;
Salandin, P. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47