Social mobility and health in European countries: Does welfare regime type matter?

被引:35
作者
Campos-Matos, Ines [1 ,2 ]
Kawachi, Ichiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Nova Univ Lisbon, Dept Int Publ Hlth & Biostat, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Europe; Welfare regimes; Social mobility; Self-rated health; SELF-RATED HEALTH; INEQUALITIES; STATES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPLANATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.035
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Health inequalities pose an important public health challenge in European countries, for which increased social mobility has been suggested as a cause. We sought to describe how the relationship between health inequalities and social mobility varies among welfare regime types in the European region. Data from six rounds of the European Social Survey was analyzed using multilevel statistical techniques, stratified by welfare regime type, including 237,535 individuals from 136 countries. Social mobility among individuals was defined according to the discrepancy between parental and offspring educational attainment. For each welfare regime type, the association between social mobility and self-rated health was examined using odds ratios and risk differences, controlling for parental education. Upwardly mobile individuals had between 23 and 44% lower odds of reporting bad or very bad self-rated health when compared to those who remained stable. On an absolute scale, former USSR countries showed the biggest and only significant differences for upward movement, while Scandinavian countries showed the smallest. Downward social mobility tended to be associated with worse health, but the results were less consistent. Upward social mobility is associated with worse health in all European welfare regime types. However, in Scandinavian countries the association of upward mobility was smaller, suggesting that the Nordic model is more effective in mitigating the impact of social mobility on health and/or of health on mobility. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   ON THE CHOICE OF HEALTH INEQUALITY MEASURE FOR THE LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF INCOME-RELATED HEALTH INEQUALITIES [J].
Allanson, Paul ;
Petrie, Dennis .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 22 (03) :353-365
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, 3 WORLDS WELFARE CAP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SOCIAL DETERMINANTS
[4]  
[Anonymous], GDP PER CAP PPP CURR
[5]  
[Anonymous], MLWIN VERSION 2 28
[6]   Determinants of relative and absolute concentration indices: evidence from 26 European countries [J].
Asgeirsdottir, Tinna Laufey ;
Ragnarsdottir, Dagny Osk .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2013, 12
[7]   'Sifting the wheat from the chaff': A two-dimensional discriminant analysis of welfare state regime theory [J].
Bambra, Clare .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2007, 41 (01) :1-28
[8]  
Beller Emily., 2006, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, V24, P353, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RSSM.2006.10.001
[9]   Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach [J].
Bonoli, G .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1997, 26 :351-372
[10]  
Brekke K. A., 2012, EXPLAINING HLTH EQUA