In vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with an αvβ6 specific peptide radiolabeled using 18F-"click" chemistry:: Evaluation and comparison with the corresponding 4-[18F]fluorobenzoyl- and 2-[18F]fluoropropionyl-peptides
被引:83
作者:
Hausner, Sven H.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Hausner, Sven H.
Marik, Jan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Marik, Jan
Gagnon, M. Karen J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Gagnon, M. Karen J.
Sutcliffe, Julie L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USAUniv Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Sutcliffe, Julie L.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Numerous radiolabeled peptides have been utilized for in vivo imaging of a variety of cell surface receptors. For applications in PET using [F-18]fluorine, peptides are radiolabeled via a prosthetic group approach. We previously developed solution-phase F-18-"click" radio-labeling and solid-phase radiolabeling using 4-[F-18]fluorobenzoic and 2-[F-18]fluoropropionic acids. Here we compare the three different radiolabeling approaches and report the effects on PET imaging and pharmacokinetics. The prosthetic groups did have an effect; metabolites with significantly different polarities were observed.