A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior

被引:159
作者
Korndoerfer, Martin [1 ]
Egloff, Boris [2 ]
Schmukle, Stefan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Psychol, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, D-55122 Mainz, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; PUBLICATION BIAS; DATA-COLLECTION; CLASS RANK; REPLICATION; TRUST; COMPASSION; HEALTH; POWER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0133193
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Does being from a higher social class lead a person to engage in more or less prosocial behavior? Psychological research has recently provided support for a negative effect of social class on prosocial behavior. However, research outside the field of psychology has mainly found evidence for positive or u-shaped relations. In the present research, we therefore thoroughly examined the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. Moreover, we analyzed whether this effect was moderated by the kind of observed prosocial behavior, the observed country, and the measure of social class. Across eight studies with large and representative international samples, we predominantly found positive effects of social class on prosociality: Higher class individuals were more likely to make a charitable donation and contribute a higher percentage of their family income to charity (32,090 >= N >= 3,957; Studies 1-3), were more likely to volunteer (37,136 >= N >= 3,964; Studies 4-6), were more helpful (N = 3,902; Study 7), and were more trusting and trustworthy in an economic game when interacting with a stranger (N = 1,421; Study 8) than lower social class individuals. Although the effects of social class varied somewhat across the kinds of prosocial behavior, countries, and measures of social class, under no condition did we find the negative effect that would have been expected on the basis of previous results reported in the psychological literature. Possible explanations for this divergence and implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:48
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[2]   Do the reciprocal trust less? [J].
Altmann, Steffen ;
Dohmen, Thomas ;
Wibral, Matthias .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 99 (03) :454-457
[3]   Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining [J].
Amanatullah, Emily T. ;
Morris, Michael W. ;
Curhan, Jared R. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (03) :723-738
[4]   IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC-GOODS - A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING [J].
ANDREONI, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (401) :464-477
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ECONOMIST
[6]  
[Anonymous], CHECKING COUNTERARGU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, America's Poor are its Most Generous Givers
[8]   A Bird's Eye View of Unethical Behavior: Commentary on Trautmann et al. (2013) [J].
Ariely, Dan ;
Mann, Heather .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (05) :498-500
[9]   Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology [J].
Asendorpf, Jens B. ;
Conner, Mark ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
De Houwer, Jan ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Fiedler, Klaus ;
Fiedler, Susann ;
Funder, David C. ;
Kliegl, Reinhold ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Perugini, Marco ;
Roberts, Brent W. ;
Schmitt, Manfred ;
vanAken, Marcel A. G. ;
Weber, Hannelore ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2013, 27 (02) :108-119
[10]   Decomposing trust and trustworthiness [J].
Ashraf, Nava ;
Bohnet, Iris ;
Piankov, Nikita .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 9 (03) :193-208