Are native and non-native pollinator friendly plants equally valuable for native wild bee communities?

被引:55
作者
Seitz, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
vanEngelsdorp, Dennis [2 ]
Leonhardt, Sara D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Anim Ecol & Trop Biol, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Entomol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
bee conservation; common garden experiment; exotic plants; non-native plants; plant-bee visitation networks; pollinator friendly plants; wild bees; FLORAL RESOURCES; INVASIVE PLANTS; GARDEN PLANTS; ALIEN PLANT; HONEY-BEE; FRUIT-SET; POLLEN; ABUNDANCE; INTEGRATION; RICHNESS;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.6826
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Bees rely on floral pollen and nectar for food. Therefore, pollinator friendly plantings are often used to enrich habitats in bee conservation efforts. As part of these plantings, non-native plants may provide valuable floral resources, but their effects on native bee communities have not been assessed in direct comparison with native pollinator friendly plantings. In this study, we performed a common garden experiment by seeding mixes of 20 native and 20 non-native pollinator friendly plant species at separate neighboring plots at three sites in Maryland, USA, and recorded flower visitors for 2 years. A total of 3,744 bees (120 species) were collected. Bee abundance and species richness were either similar across plant types (midseason and for abundance also late season) or lower at native than at non-native plots (early season and for richness also late season). The overall bee community composition differed significantly between native and non-native plots, with 11 and 23 bee species being found exclusively at one plot type or the other, respectively. Additionally, some species were more abundant at native plant plots, while others were more abundant at non-natives. Native plants hosted more specialized plant-bee visitation networks than non-native plants. Three species out of the five most abundant bee species were more specialized when foraging on native plants than on non-native plants. Overall, visitation networks were more specialized in the early season than in late seasons. Our findings suggest that non-native plants can benefit native pollinators, but may alter foraging patterns, bee community assemblage, and bee-plant network structures.
引用
收藏
页码:12838 / 12850
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs [J].
Aizen, Marcelo A. ;
Morales, Carolina L. ;
Morales, Juan M. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (02) :396-403
[2]  
Banaszak J., 1996, CONSERVATION BEES
[3]   Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks [J].
Bartomeus, Ignasi ;
Vila, Montserrat ;
Santamaria, Luis .
OECOLOGIA, 2008, 155 (04) :761-770
[4]  
Barton K, 2010, MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference
[5]   Effect of conservation management on bees and insect-pollinated grassland plant communities in three European countries [J].
Batary, Peter ;
Baldi, Andras ;
Saropataki, Miklos ;
Kohler, Florian ;
Verhulst, Jort ;
Knop, Eva ;
Herzog, Felix ;
Kleijn, David .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 136 (1-2) :35-39
[6]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[7]   Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain [J].
Baude, Mathilde ;
Kunin, William E. ;
Boatman, Nigel D. ;
Conyers, Simon ;
Davies, Nancy ;
Gillespie, Mark A. K. ;
Morton, R. Daniel ;
Smart, Simon M. ;
Memmott, Jane .
NATURE, 2016, 530 (7588) :85-+
[8]   A global picture of biological invasion threat on islands [J].
Bellard, Celine ;
Rysman, Jean-Francois ;
Leroy, Boris ;
Claud, Chantal ;
Mace, Georgina M. .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 1 (12) :1862-+
[9]  
Bluethgen Nico, 2006, BMC Ecology, V6, P9, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
[10]   Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale [J].
Carvell, Claire ;
Roy, David B. ;
Smart, Simon M. ;
Pywell, Richard F. ;
Preston, Chris D. ;
Goulson, Dave .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 132 (04) :481-489