The effect of the helicotrema on low-frequency loudness perception

被引:6
作者
Jurado, Carlos [1 ,3 ]
Marquardt, Torsten [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Elect Syst, Sect Acoust, Fredrik Bajersvej 7-A, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] UCL, UCL Ear Inst, 332 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1X 8EE, England
[3] Univ Amer, Escuela Ingn Sonido & Acoust, Ave Granados & Colimes,EC170125, Quito, Ecuador
关键词
SOUND PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS; HUMAN MIDDLE-EAR; CHINCHILLA COCHLEA; INPUT IMPEDANCE; HAIR-CELLS; INNER; NOISE; ANNOYANCE; RESPONSES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1121/1.4967295
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Below approximately 40 Hz, the cochlear travelling wave reaches the apex, and differential pressure is shunted through the helicotrema, reducing hearing sensitivity. Just above this corner frequency, a resonance feature is often observed in objectively measured middle-ear-transfer functions (METFs). This study inquires whether overall and fine structure characteristics of the METF are also perceptually evident. Equal-loudness-level contours (ELCs) were measured between 20 and 160 Hz for 14 subjects in a purpose-built test chamber. In addition, the inverse shapes of their METFs were obtained by adjusting the intensity of a low-frequency suppressor tone to maintain an equal suppression depth of otoacoustic emissions for various suppressor tone frequencies (20-250 Hz). For 11 subjects, the METFs showed a resonance. Six of them had coinciding features in both ears, and also in their ELC. For two subjects only the right-ear METF was obtainable, and in one case it was consistent with the ELC. One other subject showed a consistent lack of the feature in their ELC and in both METFs. Although three subjects displayed clear inconsistencies between both measures, the similarity between inverse METF and ELC for most subjects shows that the helicotrema has a marked impact on low-frequency sound perception. (C) 2016 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:3799 / 3809
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance [J].
Aibara, R ;
Welsh, JT ;
Puria, S ;
Goode, RL .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2001, 152 (1-2) :100-109
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ISO-226-2003
[3]   Sources and effects of low-frequency noise [J].
Berglund, B ;
Hassmen, P ;
Job, RFS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 99 (05) :2985-3002
[4]   Deriving a cochlear transducer function from low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions [J].
Bian, L ;
Chertoff, ME ;
Miller, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 112 (01) :198-210
[5]   Inner hair cell response patterns: Implications for low-frequency hearing [J].
Cheatham, MA ;
Dallos, P .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (04) :2034-2044
[6]   A new method of calculating auditory excitation patterns and loudness for steady sounds [J].
Chen, Zhangli ;
Hue, Guangshu ;
Glasberg, Brian R. ;
Moore, Brian C. J. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2011, 282 (1-2) :204-215
[8]  
DALLOS P, 1972, SCIENCE, V177, P356, DOI 10.1126/science.177.4046.356
[9]   INTRA-COCHLEAR SOUND PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN GUINEA-PIGS [J].
DANCER, A ;
FRANKE, R .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1980, 2 (3-4) :191-205
[10]   2-TONE RATE SUPPRESSION IN AUDITORY-NERVE FIBERS - DEPENDENCE ON SUPPRESSOR FREQUENCY AND LEVEL [J].
DELGUTTE, B .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1990, 49 (1-3) :225-246