Life insurance and life settlement markets with overconfident policyholders

被引:11
|
作者
Fang, Hanming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Zenan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Econ, 133 S 36th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] ShanghaiTech Univ, Sch Entrepreneurship & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life insurance; Secondary market; Overconfidence; Intertemporal elasticity of substitution; SELF-CONTROL; RISK ATTITUDES; TIME; PERCEPTIONS; INCENTIVES; COMMITMENT; GENDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2020.105093
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze how the life settlement market-the secondary market for life insurance-may affect consumer welfare in a dynamic equilibrium model of life insurance with one-sided commitment and overconfident policyholders. In our model, policyholders may lapse their life insurance policies when they lose their bequest motives; however, they are overconfident in the sense that they may underestimate the probability of losing their bequest motives. We show that in the competitive equilibrium without life settlement, overconfident consumers will buy life insurance contracts with "too much" reclassification risk insurance for later periods. The life settlement market can impose a limit on the extent to which primary insurers can exploit overconfident consumers. We show that the life settlement market may increase the equilibrium consumer welfare of overconfident consumers when they are sufficiently "vulnerable" in the sense that they have a sufficiently large intertemporal elasticity of substitution of consumption. Our result is robust to alternative specifications where (i) insurers cannot observe the subjective or objective probability that policyholders will lose their bequest motives; (ii) insurers can include health-contingent cash surrender values (CSVs) in the life insurance contract; and (iii) policyholders underestimate their future mortality risk. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:72
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 and life insurance policyholders
    Mangesh Patwardhan
    S. Uma
    Jindal Global Law Review, 2015, 6 (2) : 231 - 253
  • [2] Analyses of Factors Affecting the Withdrawal of Life Insurance Policyholders
    Sakalova, Katarina
    Peller, Frantisek
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONFERENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS (CEFE2015), 2015, : 582 - 587
  • [3] Dynamic hybrid products in life insurance: Assessing the policyholders' viewpoint
    Bohnert, Alexander
    Born, Patricia
    Gatzert, Nadine
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2014, 59 : 87 - 99
  • [4] Role of policyholders' beliefs in life insurance lapses: a model building approach
    Bhatia, Ritika
    Bhat, Anil K.
    Tikoria, Jyoti
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2024,
  • [5] Life insurance settlement and the monopolistic insurance market
    Hong, Jimin
    Seog, S. Hun
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2018, 81 : 36 - 50
  • [6] The efficiency effects of life settlement on the life insurance market
    Seog, S. Hun
    Hong, Jimin
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2019, 56 : 395 - 412
  • [7] Discovering dynamic dynamic adverse behavior of policyholders in the life insurance industry
    Islam, Md Rafiqul
    Liu, Shaowu
    Biddle, Rhys
    Razzak, Imran
    Wang, Xianzhi
    Tilocca, Peter
    Xu, Guandong
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 163
  • [8] LIFE INSURANCE POLICY SETTLEMENT OPTIONS
    SCHWARZS.S
    ATLANTA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1974, 24 (02): : 45 - 45
  • [9] Beneficiaries or policyholders? The role of women in Swedish life insurance 1900-1950
    Eriksson, Liselotte
    BUSINESS HISTORY, 2014, 56 (08) : 1335 - 1360
  • [10] Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders' and Insurers' Interests
    Reuss, Andreas
    Russ, Jochen
    Wieland, Jochen
    RISKS, 2016, 4 (02)