SUBSETS OF WOMEN WITH CLOSE OR POSITIVE MARGINS AFTER BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY WITH HIGH LOCAL RECURRENCE RISK DESPITE BREAST PLUS BOOST RADIOTHERAPY

被引:33
作者
Lupe, Krystine [2 ]
Truong, Pauline T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Alexander, Cheryl [3 ]
Lesperance, Mary [5 ]
Speers, Caroline [3 ]
Tyldesley, Scott [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver Isl Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[3] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Breast Canc Outcomes Unit, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Univ Victoria, Dept Math & Stat, Victoria, BC, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 81卷 / 04期
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast-conserving therapy; Surgical margins; Radiotherapy boost; Local recurrence; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONSERVATIVE SURGERY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; DOSE-ESCALATION; RE-EXCISION; FOLLOW-UP; STAGE-I; CANCER; IRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: (1) To examine the effect of surgical margin status on local recurrence (LR) and survival following breast-conserving therapy; (2) To identify subsets with close or positive margins with high LR risk despite whole breast radiotherapy (RT) plus boost. Methods and Materials: Subjects were 2,264 women with pT1-3, any N, M0 invasive breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast +/- boost RT. Five-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LR, breast cancer-specific and overall survival (BCSS and OS) were compared between cohorts with negative (n = 1,980), close (n = 222), and positive (n = 62) margins. LR rates were analyzed according to clinicopathologic characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression modeling and matched analysis of close/positive margin cases and negative margin controls were performed. Results: Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Boost RT was used in 92% of patients with close or positive margins. Five-year KM LR rates in the negative, close and positive margin cohorts were 1.3%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). BCSS and OS were similar in the three margin subgroups. In the close/positive margin cohort, LR rates were 10.2% with age <45 years, 11.8% with Grade III, 11.3% with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 26.3% with >= 4 positive nodes. Corresponding rates in the negative margin cohort were 2.3%, 2.4%, 1.0%, and 2.4%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort, close or positive margin, Grade III histology, >= 4 positive nodes, and lack of systemic therapy were significantly associated with higher LR risk. When close/positive margin cases were matched to negative margin controls, the difference in 5-year LR remained significant (4.25% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: On univariable analysis, subsets with close or positive margins, in combination with age <45 years, Grade III, LVI, and >= 4 positive nodes, have 5-year LR >10% despite whole breast plus boost RT. These patients should be considered for more definitive surgery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:E561 / E568
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   BOOTSTRAP INVESTIGATION OF THE STABILITY OF A COX REGRESSION-MODEL [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
ANDERSEN, PK .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (07) :771-783
[2]   Prognosis After Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence and Locoregional Recurrences in Patients Treated by Breast-Conserving Therapy in Five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols of Node-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Anderson, Stewart J. ;
Wapnir, Irene ;
Dignam, James J. ;
Fisher, Bernard ;
Mamounas, Eleftherios P. ;
Jeong, Jong-Hyeon ;
Geyer, Charles E., Jr. ;
Wickerham, D. Lawrence ;
Costantino, Joseph P. ;
Wolmark, Norman .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15) :2466-2473
[3]   LOCAL FAILURE AND MARGIN STATUS IN EARLY-STAGE BREAST-CARCINOMA TREATED WITH CONSERVATION SURGERY AND RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
ANSCHER, MS ;
JONES, P ;
PROSNITZ, LR ;
BLACKSTOCK, W ;
HEBERT, M ;
REDDICK, R ;
TUCKER, A ;
DODGE, R ;
LEIGHT, G ;
IGLEHART, JD ;
ROSENMAN, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (01) :22-28
[4]   Predictive factors for local recurrence in 2006 patients with surgically resected small breast cancer [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Lê, MG ;
Contesso, G ;
Guinebretière, JM ;
Rochard, F ;
Spielmann, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (09) :1404-1413
[5]   What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates [J].
Azu, Michelle ;
Abrahamse, Paul ;
Katz, Steven J. ;
Jagsi, Reshma ;
Morrow, Monica .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) :558-563
[6]   Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer:: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial [J].
Bartelink, Harry ;
Horiot, Jean-Claude ;
Poortmans, Philip M. ;
Struikmans, Henk ;
Van den Bogaert, Walter ;
Fourquet, Alain ;
Jager, Jos J. ;
Hoogenraad, Willem J. ;
Oei, S. Bing ;
Warlam-Rodenhuis, Carla C. ;
Pierart, Marianne ;
Collette, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (22) :3259-3265
[7]  
BC Cancer Agency, 02 STAG 1 STAG 2 INV
[8]  
Besana-Ciani Isabella, 2008, Int Semin Surg Oncol, V5, P13, DOI 10.1186/1477-7800-5-13
[9]   RISK-FACTORS IN BREAST-CONSERVATION THERAPY [J].
BORGER, J ;
KEMPERMAN, H ;
HART, A ;
PETERSE, H ;
VANDONGEN, J ;
BARTELINK, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) :653-660
[10]   Impact of systemic treatment on local control for patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy [J].
Buchholz, TA ;
Tucker, SL ;
Erwin, J ;
Mathur, D ;
Strom, EA ;
McNeese, MD ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Cristofanilli, M ;
Esteva, FJ ;
Newman, L ;
Singletary, SE ;
Buzdar, AU ;
Hunt, KK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (08) :2240-2246