Promoting shared decision making in advanced cancer: Development and piloting of a patient communication aid

被引:21
作者
Henselmans, Inge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brugel, Sabrina D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Haes, Hanneke C. J. M. [1 ]
Wolvetang, Kim J. A. [1 ]
de Vries, Laura M. [1 ]
Pieterse, Arwen H. [4 ]
Baas-Thijssen, Monique C. M. [4 ]
de Vos, Filip Y. F. [5 ]
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. [3 ,6 ]
Smets, Ellen M. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Decis Making, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Shared decision making; Oncology; Communication; Patient education; Palliative care; QUESTION PROMPT LIST; PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; LIFE; CARE; END; PARTICIPATION; INTERVENTIONS; CONSULTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To learn how to configure a patient communication aid (PCA) to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) about treatment for advanced cancer. Methods: The PCA consists of education about SDM, a question prompt list, and values clarification methods. Study 1. A first veersion was presented to 13 patients, 8 relatives and 14 bereaved relatives in interviews. Study 2. A second version was used by 18 patients in a pilot study. Patients and oncologists were interviewed, patients were surveyed, and consultations were audio-recorded. Results: Respondents reported that the aid facilitated patient control over information, raised choice awareness and promoted elaboration. Risks were identified, most importantly that the aid might upset patients. Also, some respondents reported that the PCA did not, or would not support decision making because they felt sufficiently competent, did not perceive a role for themselves, or did not perceive that the decision required elaboration. Conclusions: Opinions on the usefulness of the PCA varied. It was challenging to raise awareness about the presence of a choice, and to find a balance between comprehensive information and sensitivity. Practice implications: A future study should demonstrate whether the PCA can improve SDM, and whether this effect is stronger when oncologists receive training. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:916 / 923
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity: Does the Frame Influence Decisions? [J].
Abhyankar, Purva ;
Summers, Barbara A. ;
Velikova, Galina ;
Bekker, Hilary L. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (05) :567-582
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MAXQDA 10 ART TEXT A
[3]   What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study [J].
Audrey, Suzanne ;
Abel, Julian ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Falk, Stephen ;
Campbell, Rona .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7668) :492-496
[4]   Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence [J].
Bekker, Hilary L. ;
Winterbottom, Anna E. ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Dillard, Amanda J. ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Fowler, Floyd J. ;
Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L. ;
Shaffer, Victoria A. ;
Volk, Robert J. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
[5]   Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys [J].
Benbassat, J ;
Pilpel, D ;
Tidhar, M .
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) :81-88
[6]   The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Brandes, Kim ;
Linn, Annemiek J. ;
Butow, Phyllis N. ;
van Weert, Julia C. M. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (03) :245-252
[7]   Mechanisms that contribute to the tendency to continue chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. Qualitative observations in the clinical setting [J].
Brom, Linda ;
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. ;
Widdershoven, Guy A. M. ;
Pasman, H. Roeline W. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (03) :1317-1325
[8]   Patients' Preferences for Participation in Treatment Decision-Making at the End of Life: Qualitative Interviews with Advanced Cancer Patients [J].
Brom, Linda ;
Pasman, H. Roeline W. ;
Widdershoven, Guy A. M. ;
van der Vorst, Maurice J. D. L. ;
Reijneveld, Jaap C. ;
Postma, Tjeerd J. ;
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06)
[9]   Education and role modelling for clinical decisions with female cancer patients [J].
Brown, RF ;
Butow, PN ;
Sharrock, MA ;
Henman, M ;
Boyle, F ;
Goldstein, D ;
Tattersall, MHN .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (04) :303-316
[10]   Understanding provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer: qualitative interview study [J].
Buiting, Hilde M. ;
Rurup, Mette L. ;
Wijsbek, Henri ;
van Zuylen, Lia ;
den Hartogh, Govert .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342