Detected, yet not Diagnosed - Breast Cancer Screening with MRI Mammography in High-Risk Women

被引:3
作者
Heil, Joerg [1 ]
Czink, Elena
Schipp, Anne [1 ]
Sohn, Christof
Junkermann, Hans
Golatta, Michael
机构
[1] Univ Breast Unit Heidelberg, Dept Radiol, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Breast imaging; Familiar breast cancer; Double reading; CONTRAST-MEDIUM ENHANCEMENT; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1159/000339688
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: MRI has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive imaging method for detecting breast cancer in women at high risk, allowing depiction of cancers that are occult on mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. This high sensitivity is tempered by imperfect specificity due to overlap in the features of benign and malignant lesions. Case: We present the case of a young BRCA2 mutation carrier whose breast cancer could have been diagnosed 2 years earlier; this is a rare case of a false-negative finding in MRI. Discussion: We discuss morphological, physiological and psychological reasons for underestimation of MRI sets, especially in young women. Conclusion: We conclude that double reading in MR screening for breast cancer in high-risk women, as conducted for mammography screening, could be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 239
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Basset L., 2008, ACR PRACTICE GUIDELI
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Berg, WA
    Gutierrez, L
    NessAiver, MS
    Carter, WB
    Bhargavan, M
    Lewis, RS
    Ioffe, OB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) : 830 - 849
  • [3] Cao Y, 2004, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V128, P893
  • [4] Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: Perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue
    Delille, JP
    Slanetz, PJ
    Yeh, ED
    Kopans, DB
    Garrido, L
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (04) : 236 - 241
  • [5] Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome
    Duijm, L. E. M.
    Louwman, M. W. J.
    Groenewoud, J. H.
    van de Poll-Franse, L. V.
    Fracheboud, J.
    Coebergh, J. W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (06) : 901 - 907
  • [6] Fitzgibbons PL, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P966
  • [7] Junkermann H, 2009, ONKOPIPELINE, V2, P146
  • [8] Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition
    Kriege, M
    Brekelmans, CTM
    Boetes, C
    Besnard, PE
    Zonderland, HM
    Obdeijn, IM
    Manoliu, RA
    Kok, T
    Peterse, H
    Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA
    Muller, SH
    Meijer, S
    Oosterwijk, JC
    Beex, LVAM
    Tollenaar, RAEM
    de Koning, HJ
    Rutgers, EJT
    Klijn, JGM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) : 427 - 437
  • [9] Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer
    Kriege, Mieke
    Brekelmans, Cecile T. M.
    Obdeijn, Inge Marie
    Boetes, Carla
    Zonderland, Harmine M.
    Muller, Sara H.
    Kok, Theo
    Manoliu, Radu A.
    Besnard, A. Peter E.
    Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M. A.
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Bartels, Carina C. M.
    Kaas, Reini
    Meijer, Siebren
    Oosterwijk, Jan C.
    Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Klijn, Jan G. M.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [10] MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Schrading, Simone
    Bieling, Heribert B.
    Wardelmann, Eva
    Leutner, Claudia C.
    Koenig, Roy
    Kuhn, Walther
    Schild, Hans H.
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 370 (9586) : 485 - 492