Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced breast MRI versus X-ray mammography in women with different degrees of breast density

被引:5
作者
Barkhausen, Joerg [1 ]
Bischof, Arpad [1 ]
Haverstock, Daniel [2 ]
Klemens, Mark [3 ]
Brueggenwerth, Guenther [3 ]
Weber, Olaf [4 ,5 ]
Endrikat, Jan [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Lubeck, Germany
[2] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceut Inc, Whippany, NJ USA
[3] Bayer AG, Gen Clin Imaging Serv, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Bayer AG, Radiol R&D, Berlin, Germany
[5] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Bonn, Bonn, Germany
[6] Univ Med Sch Saarland, Dept Gynecol Obstet & Reprod Med, Homburg, Germany
关键词
Dense breasts; ACR; 5; density; breast magnetic resonance imaging; gadobutrol; X-ray mammography; RESONANCE-IMAGING MRI; AVERAGE RISK; CANCER; GADOBUTROL; ULTRASOUND; RECOMMENDATIONS; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; PATTERNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0284185120936271
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Detection of breast cancer in women with high breast densities is a clinical challenge. Purpose To study the influence of different degrees of breast density on the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (CE-BMRI) versus X-ray mammography (XRM). Material and Methods We performed an additional analysis of two large Phase III clinical trials (G1; G2) which included women with histologically proven breast cancers, called "index cancers." Additional cancers were detected during image reading. We compared the sensitivity of CE-BMRI and XRM in women with different breast densities (ACR A -> D; Version 5). For each study, six blinded readers evaluated the images. Results are given as the "Median Reader." Results A total of 774 patients were included, 169 had additional cancers. While sensitivity of CE-BMRI for detecting all index cancers was independent of breast density (ACR A -> D) (G1: 83%-> 83%; G2: 91%-> 91%) the sensitivity of XRM declined (ACR A -> D) (G1: 79%-> 62%; G2: 82%-> 64%). Thus, the sensitivity difference between both imaging modalities in ACR A breasts of 3% (G1) and 9% (G2) increased to 21% (G1) and 26% (G2) in ACR D breasts. Sensitivity of CE-BMRI for detecting at least one additional cancer increased with increasing breast density (ACR A -> D) (G1: 50%-> 73%, G2: 57%-> 81%). XRM's sensitivity decreased (G1: 34%-> 20%) or remained stable (G2: 24%-> 25%). Conclusion CE-BMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity compared to XRM.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 593
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer [J].
Albert, Marissa ;
Schnabel, Freya ;
Chun, Jennifer ;
Schwartz, Shira ;
Lee, Jiyon ;
Leite, Ana Paula Klautau ;
Moy, Linda .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (06) :987-992
[2]  
American College of Radiology, REP SYST
[3]   Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue [J].
Bakker, Marije F. ;
de Lange, Stephanie V. ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Peeters, Petra H. M. ;
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. ;
Emaus, Marleen J. ;
Loo, Claudette E. ;
Bisschops, Robertus H. C. ;
Lobbes, Marc B. I. ;
de Jong, Matthijn D. F. ;
Duvivier, Katya M. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
van Diest, Paul J. ;
Mali, Willem P. T. M. ;
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J. ;
Veldhuis, Wouter B. ;
van Gils, Carla H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) :2091-2102
[4]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[5]   High-risk breast cancer surveillance with MRI: 10-year experience from the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [J].
Bick, Ulrich ;
Engel, Christoph ;
Krug, Barbara ;
Heindel, Walter ;
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Rhiem, Kerstin ;
Maintz, David ;
Golatta, Michael ;
Speiser, Dorothee ;
Rjosk-Dendorfer, Dorothea ;
Laemmer-Skarke, Irina ;
Dietzel, Frederic ;
Schaefer, Karl Werner Fritz ;
Leinert, Elena ;
Weigel, Stefanie ;
Sauer, Stephanie ;
Pertschy, Stefanie ;
Hofmockel, Thomas ;
Hagert-Winkler, Anne ;
Kast, Karin ;
Quante, Anne ;
Meindl, Alfons ;
Kiechle, Marion ;
Loeffler, Markus ;
Schmutzler, Rita K. ;
Blohmer, Jens-Uwe ;
Horn, Denise ;
Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda ;
Huebbel, Verena ;
Herold, Natalie ;
Puesken, Michael ;
Wimberger, Pauline ;
Meisel, Cornelia ;
Keller, Katja ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Vesper, Anne-Sophie ;
Fehm, Tanja N. ;
Schlegelberger, Brigitte ;
Auber, Bernd ;
Wallaschek, Hannah ;
Heil, Joerg ;
Schott, Sarah ;
Dikow, Nicola ;
Mundhenke, Christoph ;
Arnold, Norbert ;
Caliebe, Almuth ;
Briest, Susanne ;
Lemke, Johannes ;
Gril, Sabine ;
Pfeifer, Katharina .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (01) :217-228
[6]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[7]   Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Minkin, Salomon .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (06)
[8]   MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design [J].
Emaus, Marleen J. ;
Bakker, Marije F. ;
Peeters, Petra H. M. ;
Loo, Claudette E. ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
de Jong, Mathijn D. F. ;
Bisschops, Robertus H. C. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Duvivier, Katya M. ;
Lobbes, Marc B. I. ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J. ;
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. ;
Mali, Willem P. Th M. ;
Veldhuis, Wouter B. ;
van Gils, Carla H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (02) :527-537
[9]   Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Comparison of gadobutrol vs. Gd-DTPA [J].
Escribano, F. ;
Sentis, M. ;
Oliva, J. C. ;
Tortajada, L. ;
Villajos, M. ;
Martin, A. ;
Ganau, S. .
RADIOLOGIA, 2018, 60 (01) :49-56
[10]   Intraindividual, randomized comparison of the macrocyclic contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in breast magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Renz, Diane M. ;
Karle, Bettina ;
Schwenke, Carsten ;
Ingod-Heppner, Barbara ;
Reles, Angela ;
Engelken, Florian J. ;
Huppertz, Alexander ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Taupitz, Matthias .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (03) :837-849