Beyond a Pragmatic Account of the Aesthetic in Science Education

被引:7
作者
Toscano, Maurizio [1 ]
Quay, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Grad Sch Educ, 100 Leicester St, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Science education; Ontological difference; Heidegger; Aesthetics; Pragmatism; HEIDEGGER; EXPERIENCE; ART;
D O I
10.1007/s11191-020-00162-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper argues that pragmatist philosophies and theories of science, education and art have dominated our understanding of aesthetics in science education in ways that overshadow other important and pertinent aspects of aesthetic experience. For all its strengths, a pragmatist account of science education and aesthetics remains vulnerable to a kind of instrumentalism that reduces the objects, practices and persons in science education to merebeings: the source and subject of a reductive objectification of experience. This paper proposes a counter-balancing perspective that both respects and also adds to that offered by pragmatism. It does so with reference to Heidegger's ontological difference: the one side of which is concerned with pragmatic, scientific, reflective thinking and the other with a meditative and phenomenological way of thinking that draws out our unmediated experiences of the world. Moreover, it argues that the latter is accessible in science classrooms by approaching objects and practices as works of art.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 163
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Four Seminars, P35
[2]  
Burnham Douglas., 2010, NIETZSCHES BIRTH TRA
[3]   The Role of Art Practice in Elementary School Science [J].
Caiman, Cecilia ;
Jakobson, Britt .
SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2019, 28 (1-2) :153-175
[4]  
Cavanaugh S., 2014, Education and Culture, V30, P57, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2014.0001, DOI 10.1353/EAC.2014.0001]
[5]  
Colucci-Gray L., 2019, Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Education, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190264093.013.398, 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.398]
[6]   Wittgenstein, Heidegger and humility [J].
Cooper, DE .
PHILOSOPHY, 1997, 72 (279) :105-123
[7]  
Csikszentmihalyi M., 2014, Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-9088-815, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8]
[8]  
Dewey J., 1944, Democracy and education
[9]  
Dewey J., 2005, Art as experience
[10]  
Dewey J., 1910, How we think, DOI 10.1037/10903-000