Predictive models in ecotoxicology: Bridging the gap between scientific progress and regulatory applicability-Remarks and research needs

被引:6
作者
Vighi, Marco [1 ]
Barsi, Alpar [2 ]
Focks, Andreas [3 ]
Grisoni, Francesca [4 ]
机构
[1] IMDEA Water Inst, Alcala De Henares, Madrid, Spain
[2] Dutch Board Authorisat Plant Protect Prod & Bioci, Ede, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Milan, Italy
关键词
QSAR; Effect modelling; Bioaccumulation modelling; TK-TD; Regulation; QSAR MODELS; POPULATION; VALIDATION; CURATION; SOIL;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4136
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper concludes a special series of 7 articles (4 on toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic [TK-TD] models and 3 on quantitative structure-activity relationship [QSAR] models) published in previous issues of Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). The present paper summarizes the special series articles and highlights their contribution to the topic of increasing the regulatory applicability of effect models. For both TK-TD and QSAR approaches, we then describe the main research needs. The use of TK-TD models for describing sublethal effects must be better developed, particularly through the improvement of the dynamic energy budget (DEBtox) approach. The potential of TK-TD models for moving from lower (molecular) to higher (population) hierarchical levels is highlighted as a promising research line. Some relevant issues to improve the acceptance of QSAR models at the regulatory level are also described, such as increased transparency of the performance assessment and of the modeling algorithms, model documentation, relevance of the chosen target for regulatory needs, and improved mechanistic interpretability. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;00:000-000. (c) 2019 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Scientific Opinion on good modelling practice in the context of mechanistic effect models for risk assessment of plant protection products [J].
Aagaard, Alf ;
Brock, Theo ;
Capri, Ettore ;
Duquesne, Sabine ;
Filipic, Metka ;
Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F. ;
Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I. ;
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard ;
Klein, Michael ;
Kuhl, Thomas ;
Laskowski, Ryszard ;
Liess, Matthias ;
Mantovani, Alberto ;
Ockleford, Colin ;
Ossendorp, Bernadette ;
Pickford, Daniel ;
Smith, Robert ;
Sousa, Paulo ;
Sundh, Ingvar ;
Tiktak, Aaldrik ;
Van Der Linden, Ton .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (03)
[2]   Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models [J].
Alexander, D. L. J. ;
Tropsha, A. ;
Winkler, David A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (07) :1316-1322
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SCHER SCENIHR SCCS O, P154
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EUEvaluation Process under 91/414/EEC
[5]   Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures [J].
Ballabio, Davide ;
Grisoni, Francesca ;
Todeschini, Roberto .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2018, 174 :33-44
[6]   Fit Reduced GUTS Models Online: From Theory to Practice [J].
Baudrot, Virgile ;
Veber, Philippe ;
Gence, Guillaume ;
Charles, Sandrine .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 (05) :625-630
[7]   Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity of Benzene Derivatives to Tetrahymena pyriformis According to OECD Principles [J].
Castillo-Garit, Juan A. ;
Abad, Concepcion ;
Casanola-Martin, Gerardo M. ;
Jones Barigye, Stephen ;
Torrens, Francisco ;
Torreblanca, Amparo .
CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2016, 22 (33) :5085-5094
[8]   Real External Predictivity of QSAR Models: How To Evaluate It? Comparison of Different Validation Criteria and Proposal of Using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient [J].
Chirico, Nicola ;
Gramatica, Paola .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2011, 51 (09) :2320-2335
[9]   On the Misleading Use of QF32 for QSAR Model Comparison [J].
Consonni, Viviana ;
Todeschini, Roberto ;
Ballabio, Davide ;
Grisoni, Francesca .
MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2019, 38 (1-2)
[10]   Comments on the Definition of the Q2 Parameter for QSAR Validation [J].
Consonni, Viviana ;
Ballabio, Davide ;
Todeschini, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (07) :1669-1678