Evaluation of Attention Training and Metacognitive Facilitation to Improve Reading Comprehension in Aphasia

被引:34
作者
Lee, Jaime B. [1 ]
Sohlberg, McKay Moore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
aphasia; attention; reading; resource allocation; WORKING-MEMORY; AUDITORY VIGILANCE; MILD APHASIA; TREATING ATTENTION; EFFECT SIZES; INDIVIDUALS; TASK; LANGUAGE; DEFICITS; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0099)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This pilot study investigated the impact of direct attention training combined with metacognitive facilitation on reading comprehension in individuals with aphasia. Method: A single-subject, multiple baseline design was employed across 4 participants to evaluate potential changes in reading comprehension resulting from an 8-week intervention using Attention Process Training-3 (APT-3). The primary outcome measure was a maze reading task. Pre- and posttesting included attention and reading comprehension measures. Visual inspection of graphed performance data across conditions was used as the primary method of analysis. Treatment effect sizes were calculated for changes in reading comprehension probes from baseline to maintenance phases. Results: Two of the study's 4 participants demonstrated improvements in maze reading, with corresponding effect sizes that were small in magnitude according to benchmarks for aphasia treatment research. All 4 participants made improvements on select standardized measures of attention. Conclusion: Interventions that include a metacognitive component with direct attention training may elicit improvements in participants' attention and allocation of resources. Maze passage reading is a repeated measure that appears sensitive to treatment-related changes in reading comprehension. Issues for future research related to measurement, candidacy, and clinical delivery are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:S318 / S333
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? [J].
Baddeley, A .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (11) :417-423
[2]  
Baddeley A., 2002, European Psychologist. Vol, V7, P85, DOI [DOI 10.1021//1016-9040.7.2.85, DOI 10.1027//1016-9040.7.2.85, 10.1027/1016-9040.7.2.85]
[3]   Reducing Attention Deficits After Stroke Using Attention Process Training A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Barker-Collo, Suzanne L. ;
Feigin, Valery L. ;
Lawes, Carlene M. M. ;
Parag, Varsha ;
Senior, Hugh ;
Rodgers, Anthony .
STROKE, 2009, 40 (10) :3293-3298
[4]   Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature [J].
Beeson, Pelagie M. ;
Robey, Randall R. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 16 (04) :161-169
[5]   Sources of variance in curriculum-based measures of silent reading [J].
Brown-Chidsey, R ;
Davis, L ;
Maya, C .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2003, 40 (04) :363-377
[6]   A multicenter, randomized clinical trial of a Cognitive Remediation Program for childhood survivors of a pediatric malignancy [J].
Butler, Robert W. ;
Fairclough, Diane L. ;
Katz, Ernest R. ;
Noll, Robert B. ;
Copeland, Donna R. ;
Mulhern, Raymond K. ;
Kazak, Anne E. ;
Patel, Sunita K. ;
Sahler, Olle Jane Z. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 76 (03) :367-378
[7]   Working memory and aphasia [J].
Caspari, I ;
Parkinson, SR ;
LaPointe, LL ;
Katz, RC .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1998, 37 (02) :205-223
[8]   Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Intensity of Treatment and Constraint-Induced Language Therapy for Individuals With Stroke-Induced Aphasia [J].
Cherney, Leora R. ;
Patterson, Janet P. ;
Raymer, Anastasia ;
Frymark, Tobi ;
Schooling, Tracy .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (05) :1282-1299
[9]   Switching in adults with aphasia [J].
Chiou, Hsinhuei S. ;
Kennedy, Mary R. T. .
APHASIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (7-8) :1065-1075
[10]  
Clark H.M., 1995, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, V4, P143, DOI DOI 10.1044/1058-0360.0404.143