Randomized study of postcesarean analgesia with intrathecal morphine alone or combined with clonidine

被引:10
作者
Carvalho, Francisco A. E. [1 ]
Tenorio, Sergio B. [2 ,3 ]
Shiohara, Fabiano T. [1 ]
Maia, Luiz R. [1 ]
Mota, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Cruz, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Treatment, 1889 Batel Av, BR-80420090 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Surg Dept, Gen Carneiro St, BR-80060900 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Parana, Anesthesiol Serv, Hosp Clin, Gen Carneiro St, BR-80060900 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Cesarean; Clonidine; Morphine; Intrathecal; Postoperative analgesia; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; CESAREAN-SECTION; HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; DOSE-RESPONSE; EFFICACY; RELIEF; ADJUVANT; OPIOIDS; MG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.024
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: To investigate the efficacy of the combination of intrathecal morphine with clonidine in comparison with 2 doses of intrathecal morphine alone for postcesarean analgesia. Design: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Maternity ward of Hospital Santa Cruz, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil (operating room and ward). Patients: The study included 195 American Society of Anesthesiologist I to III singleton parturients undergoing elective cesarean section. Interventions: The patients were randomized into 3 groups (M50, M100, and M/C). Patients were anesthetized intrathecally with 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 50 mu g or 100 mu g morphine (groups M50 and M100, respectively) or 50 mu g morphine and 75 mu g clonidine (group M/C). Measurements: The patients were subsequently assessed for pain levels and side effects at 9 to 11 hours and 22 to 24 hours after the injection. Main results: There was no difference in the quality of pain relief among the groups. In all 3 groups, pain was more intense during the first assessment. Pruritus and nausea were more frequent in group M100, and dizziness was more frequent in group M/C; however, these results were statistically insignificant. The group receiving clonidine showed a significantly lower incidence of shivering compared with the other groups. Conclusions: At these doses, there was no benefit of associating clonidine with morphine to improve post cesarean analgesia. Considering that higher doses of morphine were associated with more side effects, 50 mu g of intrathecal morphine alone seems to be a better option for analgesia. The use of clonidine to reduce postoperative shivering must be balanced against the potential risks of hypotension, bradycardia, dizziness, and sedation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 402
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ABBOUD TK, 1988, ANESTH ANALG, V67, P137
[2]   THE POSTANESTHESIA RECOVERY SCORE REVISITED [J].
ALDRETE, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (01) :89-91
[3]   Postoperative pain experience: Results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged [J].
Apfelbaum, JL ;
Chen, C ;
Mehta, SS ;
Gan, TJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (02) :534-540
[4]  
Bajwa Sukhminder Jit Singh, 2012, Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, V2, P63, DOI 10.4103/2229-5151.97269
[5]  
Braga AA, 2012, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V62, P775, DOI 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70178-2
[6]   Small doses of intrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery [J].
Cardoso, MMSC ;
Carvalho, JCA ;
Amaro, AR ;
Prado, AA ;
Cappelli, EL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) :538-541
[7]   Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia - A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Dahl, JB ;
Jeppesen, IS ;
Jorgensen, H ;
Wetterslev, J ;
Moiniche, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (06) :1919-1927
[8]  
Braga ADD, 2013, ACTA CIR BRAS, V28, P26, DOI 10.1590/S0102-86502013000100005
[9]   Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data [J].
Dolin, SJ ;
Cashman, JN ;
Bland, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (03) :409-423
[10]  
de Carvalho FAE, 2013, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V63, P492, DOI [10.1016/j.bjane.2013.01.001, 10.1016/j.bjan.2013.01.001]