Acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer using a daily water-filled endorectal balloon

被引:17
作者
Deville, Curtiland [1 ]
Both, Stefan
Bui, Viet
Hwang, Wei-Ting [2 ]
Tan, Kay-See [2 ]
Schaer, Mattia
Tochner, Zelig
Vapiwala, Neha
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Rectal balloon; IMRT; Toxicity; Prostate cancer; RECTAL BALLOON; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; VOLUME; IMRT; IMMOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-7-76
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Our purpose was to report acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity rates for prostate cancer patients undergoing image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) with a daily endorectal water-filled balloon (ERBH2O), and assess associations with planning parameters and pretreatment clinical characteristics. Methods: The first 100 patients undergoing prostate and proximal seminal vesicle IG-IMRT with indexed-lumen 100 cc ERBH2O to 79.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions at our institution from 12/2008-12/2010 were assessed. Pretreatment characteristics, organ-at-risk dose volume histograms, and maximum GU and GI toxicities (CTCAE 3.0) were evaluated. Logistic regression models evaluated univariate association between toxicities and dosimetric parameters, and uni- and multivariate association between toxicities and pretreatment characteristics. Results: Mean age was 68 (range 51-88). Thirty-two, 49, and 19 patients were low, intermediate, and high-risk, respectively; 40 received concurrent androgen deprivation. No grade 3 or greater toxicities were recorded. Maximum GI toxicity was grade 0, 1, and 2 in 69%, 23%, and 8%, respectively. Infield (defined as 1 cm above/below the CTV) rectal mean/median doses, D75, V30, and V40 and hemorrhoid history were associated with grade 2 GI toxicity (Ps < 0.05). Maximum acute GU toxicity was grade 0, 1, and 2 for 17%, 41%, and 42% of patients, respectively. Infield bladder V20 (P = 0.03) and pretreatment International Prostate Symptom Scale (IPSS) (P = 0.003) were associated with grade 2 GU toxicity. Conclusion: Prostate IG-IMRT using a daily ERBH2O shows low rates of acute GI toxicity compared to previous reports of air-filled ERB IMRT when using stringent infield rectum constraints and comparable GU toxicities.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P INT CONS BEN PROST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0
[3]   Tolerance of endorectal balloon in 396 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer [J].
Bastasch, MD ;
Teh, BS ;
Mai, WY ;
McGary, JE ;
Grant, WH ;
Butler, EB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2006, 29 (01) :8-11
[4]  
Both S., 2010, INT J RAD ONCOL BIOL
[5]  
Chen ME, 2000, CANCER, V89, P1800, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1800::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-D
[7]   A practical method to achieve prostate gland immobilization and target verification for daily treatment [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Lopes, L ;
Nissen, K ;
O'Farrell, DA ;
Gordon, L ;
Tempany, CM ;
Cormack, RA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1431-1436
[8]   CLINICAL TOXICITIES AND DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS AFTER WHOLE-PELVIS VERSUS PROSTATE-ONLY INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER [J].
Deville, Curtiland ;
Both, Stefan ;
Hwang, Wei-Ting ;
Tochner, Zelig ;
Vapiwala, Neha .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03) :763-772
[9]  
Ebert M A, 2001, Australas Radiol, V45, P205, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00900.x
[10]  
Goldner G, 2006, WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V118, P224, DOI 10.1007/s00508-006-0588-z