Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: Low tie preferred over high tie. A review

被引:166
作者
Lange, Marilyne M. [2 ]
Buunen, Mark [1 ]
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. [2 ]
Lange, Johan F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
total mesorectal excision; rectal cancer; high tie; low tie; central arterial ligation; inferior mesenteric artery;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), and ligation at a level without any intraoperative definition of the inferior mesenteric or superior rectal arteries. Publications concerning the level of ligation in rectal cancer surgery were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three articles that evaluated oncologic outcome (n=14), anastomotic circulation (n=5), autonomous innervation (n=5), and tension on the anastomosis/anastomotic leakage (n=2) matched our selection criteria and were systematically reviewed. There is insufficient evidence to support high tie as the technique of choice. Furthermore, high tie has been proven to decrease perfusion and innervation of the proximal limb. It is concluded that neither the high tie strategy nor the low tie strategy is evidence based and that low tie is anatomically less invasive with respect to circulation and autonomous innervation of the proximal limb of anastomosis. As a consequence, in rectal cancer surgery low tie should be the preferred method.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1145
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Distribution of lymph node metastasis and level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation in colorectal cancer [J].
Adachi, Y ;
Inomata, M ;
Miyazaki, N ;
Sato, K ;
Shiraishi, N ;
Kitano, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 26 (03) :179-182
[2]  
Adachi Y, 2000, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V47, P155
[3]  
AULT GW, 1952, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V94, P223
[4]  
BACON H E, 1958, Dis Colon Rectum, V1, P457, DOI 10.1007/BF02633415
[5]   Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer - Editorial comment [J].
Beck, David E. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (03) :307-307
[6]   Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph node dissection in colorectal cancer [J].
Bruch, HP ;
Schwandner, O ;
Schiedeck, THK ;
Roblick, UJ .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 384 (02) :167-175
[7]   Prediction of mesorectal nodal metastases after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: results of a randomised trial. Implication for subsequent local excision [J].
Bujko, K ;
Nowacki, MP ;
Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A ;
Kepka, L ;
Winkler-Spytkowska, B ;
Suwinski, R ;
Oledzki, J ;
Stryczynska, G ;
Wieczorek, A ;
Serkies, K ;
Rogowska, D ;
Tokar, P .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :234-240
[8]   FLUSH AORTIC TIE VERSUS SELECTIVE PRESERVATION OF THE ASCENDING LEFT COLIC ARTERY IN LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
CORDER, AP ;
KARANJIA, ND ;
WILLIAMS, JD ;
HEALD, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (07) :680-682
[9]  
DEDDISH MR, 1951, CANCER, V4, P1364, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195111)4:6<1364::AID-CNCR2820040618>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-M