Robotic Approach to Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Results in Low Long-Term Recurrence Rate and Beneficial Patient-Centered Outcomes

被引:27
作者
Gerull, William D. [1 ]
Cho, Daniel [2 ]
Kuo, Iris [1 ]
Arefanian, Saeed [3 ]
Kushner, Bradley S. [1 ]
Awad, Michael M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sect Minimally Invas Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Surg, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.754
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding important long-term outcomes after robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs, such as symptom relief and recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing robotic PEH repair. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, IRB-approved study analyzed adult patients who underwent robotic PEH repair, from 2010 to 2014, at a high-volume tertiary academic medical center. Detailed information on patient characteristics, perioperative factors, and long-term patient-reported outcomes for up to 5 years postoperatively were collected. Objective long-term outcomes included radiographic evidence of PEH recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients underwent robotic PEH repair during the study period-70% were primary, 30% were revisional. Seventy-eight percent of patients (181) had a type III PEH, 21%(49) had a type IV, and 1% (3) had a type II. At 5 years postoperatively, 62% of patients (145 of 233) were available for follow-up, with a radiographic recurrence rate of 9%(13 of 145). Additionally, there was a significant improvement in the GERD-HRQL score at 5 years postoperatively (preoperative: 25.6 +/- 8.7, 5-year postoperative, 4.5 +/- 1.7, p < 0.01, 95% CI 19.7 to 22.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest longitudinal robotic foregut surgical databases to date. Our results demonstrate that robotic PEH repair with an experienced surgical team is a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopic repair, with excellent long-term outcomes, including a very low recurrence rate. (C) 2020 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 526
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]   Patient reported outcomes in gastroesophageal reflux disease: An overview of available measures [J].
Talley, NJ ;
Wiklund, I .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (01) :21-33
[12]   Robotic voluminous paraesophageal hernia repair: a case report and review of the literature [J].
Tartaglia, Nicola ;
Pavone, Giovanna ;
Di Lascia, Alessandra ;
Vovola, Fernanda ;
Maddalena, Francesca ;
Fersini, Alberto ;
Pacilli, Mario ;
Ambrosi, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 14 (01)
[13]   A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication [J].
van Beek, Darren B. ;
Auyang, Edward D. ;
Soper, Nathaniel J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (03) :706-712
[14]   Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review [J].
Vasudevan V. ;
Reusche R. ;
Nelson E. ;
Kaza S. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (1) :81-86
[15]   Laparoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [J].
Watson, DI .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :19-35
[16]   Primary versus redo paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of operative and quality of life outcomes [J].
Zahiri, H. Reza ;
Weltz, Adam S. ;
Sibia, Udai S. ;
Paranji, Neethi ;
Leydorf, Steven D. ;
Fantry, George T. ;
Park, Adrian E. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (12) :5166-5174