Available transfer capability evaluation in a deregulated electricity market considering correlated wind power

被引:21
作者
Chen, Houhe [1 ]
Fang, Xin [2 ]
Zhang, Rufeng [1 ]
Jiang, Tao [1 ]
Li, Guoqing [1 ]
Li, Fangxing [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Elect Power Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Jilin 132012, JL, Peoples R China
[2] GE Grid Solut, Market Applicat, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
wind power plants; power markets; transmission networks; power generation economics; linear programming; integer programming; power generation planning; transfer capability evaluation; deregulated electricity market; correlated wind power; available transfer capability; total transfer capability; transmission commitments; independent system operator; economic dispatch; continuous power flow; wind power; bi-level optimisation framework; mathematic program with equilibrium constraints; Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions; mixed-integer linear programming problem; IEEE 118-bus systems; wind farms; planning; ECONOMIC-DISPATCH; PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM OPERATION; ENERGY-STORAGE; SIMULATION; MODEL; ALGORITHM; FLOW; ATC;
D O I
10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1883
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Evaluation of available transfer capability (ATC) is a complicated process involving the determination of the total transfer capability (TTC) and the existing transfer commitments (ETC). Considering the uncertain renewable generation such as wind power will bring more challenge to this process. Previously the uncertainty of wind power is considered either in the ED model or the following TTC calculation, but not included in two process simultaneously. Therefore, the ATC output may not be accurate since the uncertainty impact two problem simultaneously. To consider the uncertainty and correlation of wind power in both ISO's ED and ATC evaluation, this paper proposes a bi-level optimization framework in which the ATC evaluation is formulated as the upper level problem and the ED is the lower level. The bi-level model is first converted to a mathematic program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC) by recasting the lower level problem as its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions, and then transformed to a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem which can be solved by existing optimization tools. Case studies on the PJM 5-bus and IEEE 118-bus systems are presented to verify the proposed methodology and the impacts of correlation of wind power on ATC are analysed.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 61
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Optimal bidding strategy in transmission-constrained electricity markets [J].
Kardakos, Evaggelos G. ;
Simoglou, Christos K. ;
Bakirtzis, Anastasios G. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 109 :141-149
[22]  
Li F.X., 2010, P IEEE PES GEN M, V7, P25
[23]   DCOPF-based LMP simulation: Algorithm, comparison with ACOPF, and sensitivity [J].
Li, Fangxing ;
Bo, Rui .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (04) :1475-1485
[24]   Probabilistic assessment of available transfer capability considering spatial correlation in wind power integrated system [J].
Luo Gang ;
Chen Jinfu ;
Cai Defu ;
Shi Dongyuan ;
Xianzhong, Duan .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2013, 7 (12) :1527-1535
[25]   Setting the Operating Reserve Using Probabilistic Wind Power Forecasts [J].
Matos, Manuel A. ;
Bessa, R. J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (02) :594-603
[26]   Simultaneous transfer capability assessment by combining interior point methods and Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Mello, JCO ;
Melo, ACG ;
Granville, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1997, 12 (02) :736-742
[27]  
Min L., 2005, P IEEE PES GEN M, V6, P12
[28]   Probabilistic power flow with correlated wind sources [J].
Morales, J. M. ;
Baringo, L. ;
Conejo, A. J. ;
Minguez, R. .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2010, 4 (05) :641-651
[29]   Computational voltage stability assessment of large-scale power systems [J].
Nallan, HC ;
Rastgoufard, P .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1996, 38 (03) :177-181
[30]  
North American Electric Reliability Council, 1996, Tech. Rep.