Deception and the misinformation effect: An event-related potential study

被引:11
作者
Meek, Scott W. [1 ]
Phillips, Michelle C. [2 ]
Boswell, Corey P. [2 ]
Vendemia, Jennifer M. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina Upstate, Dept Psychol, Spartanburg, SC 29303 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Dept Psychol, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Deception; Misinformation; P3b; Frontal N400; ERP; MISLEADING POSTEVENT INFORMATION; EXECUTIVE PROCESSES; BRAIN POTENTIALS; RESPONSE-TIME; MEMORY; RECOGNITION; TRUE; RECOLLECTION; FAMILIARITY; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.11.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research in the field of deception often tests participants' ability to lie about information with which they are familiar and have a strong recall of base truth. The current study examined the impact of uncertainty in memory on the ability to deceive, as may happen in real-world eye-witness scenarios. A visual misinformation paradigm was combined with event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the impact of deception and misinformation on ERP components previously associated with deception and memory processes. Deception was associated with strong parietal P3b suppression and a large frontal negativity (N400). Misinformation was also associated with parietal P3b suppression and had effects on a late positive component (LPC) in occipital regions. The results indicate that while deception and memory uncertainty may have combined effects, they still both independently influence information processing. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 87
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception [J].
Abe, Nobuhito ;
Okuda, Jiro ;
Suzuki, Maki ;
Sasaki, Hiroshi ;
Matsuda, Tetsuya ;
Mori, Etsuro ;
Tsukada, Minoru ;
Fujii, Toshikatsu .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (12) :2811-2819
[2]   Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection [J].
Allan, K ;
Wilding, EL ;
Rugg, MD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1998, 98 (2-3) :231-252
[3]   A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection [J].
Allen, JJB ;
Iacono, WG .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (02) :234-240
[4]   Limitations to the detection of deception: True and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure [J].
Allen, John J. B. ;
Mertens, Ralf .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 4 (06) :473-490
[5]   A CLASSIFICATION OF HAND PREFERENCE BY ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS [J].
ANNETT, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 61 (03) :303-&
[6]   ARE THERE ALTERNATIVES TO TRADITIONAL POLYGRAPH PROCEDURES [J].
BASHORE, TR ;
RAPP, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 113 (01) :3-22
[8]   DETECTION OF GUILTY KNOWLEDGE WITH EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS [J].
BOAZ, TL ;
PERRY, NW ;
RANEY, G ;
FISCHLER, IS ;
SHUMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (06) :788-795
[9]   Perceptual and semantic familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related potential study [J].
Boldini, Angela ;
Algarabel, Salvador ;
Ibanez, Antonio ;
Bajo, M. Teresa .
NEUROREPORT, 2008, 19 (03) :305-308
[10]   THE COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE (CFQ) AND ITS CORRELATES [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
COOPER, PF ;
FITZGERALD, P ;
PARKES, KR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 21 (FEB) :1-16