Indications for First Caesarean and Delivery Mode in Subsequent Trial of Labour

被引:17
作者
Fagerberg, Marie C. [1 ,2 ]
Marsal, Karel [2 ]
Ekstrom, Per [4 ]
Kallen, Karin [3 ]
机构
[1] Ystad Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, S-27182 Ystad, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Reprod Epidemiol, Lund, Sweden
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Caesarean indication; delivery mode; trial of labour;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.12024
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background A previous caesarean delivery is no longer an indication per se for a subsequent, planned caesarean. We performed this study to identify women suitable for trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC), investigating the association between the indication for the first caesarean and the risk of unplanned caesarean in the second pregnancy. Methods We identified women with their first two pregnancies registered in the Swedish Medical Birth Registry 19922007. The indications for caesarean in the first pregnancy were determined using a previously published hierarchical system. For each indication group, the rate of caesarean among women with a first caesarean (n?=?59?643) and a TOLAC in the second pregnancy was compared with that of primiparae (parity 0) (n?=?354 053). Results The TOLAC rate was 69.5%. Among women with TOLAC, the uterine rupture rate was 1.1%. The success rate of TOLAC varied substantially based on the indication for the first caesarean (range 5183%). Multiple births, breech presentation, and placenta praevia in the first pregnancy were associated with marginally increased odds of unplanned caesarean in the second pregnancy when compared with primiparae (adjusted OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.10, 1.48], 1.42 [1.34, 1.51], and 1.65 [1.17, 2.31]; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval). The indications based on complications during labour/delivery, macrosomia, and maternal diabetes, were associated with substantially increased OR: 3.87 [3.70, 4.06], 4.15 [3.74, 4.61], and 4.62 [3.79, 5.63], respectively. Conclusions Considering the indications for caesarean in the first pregnancy before recommending a TOLAC or a planned caesarean in the second pregnancy may help to lower the rate of unplanned caesarean deliveries.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 80
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
Cnattingius S., Ericson A., Gunnarskog J., Kallen B., A quality study of a medical birth registry, Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 18, pp. 143-148, (1990)
[12]  
Marsal K., Persson P.H., Larsen T., Lilja H., Selbing A., Sultan B., Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights, Acta Paediatrica, 85, pp. 843-848, (1996)
[13]  
Al-Zirqi I., Stray-Pedersen B., Forsen L., Vangen S., Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section, BJOG, 117, pp. 809-820, (2010)
[14]  
Landon M.B., Hauth J.C., Leveno K.J., Spong C.Y., Leindecker S., Varner M.W., Et al., Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, New England Journal of Medicine, 351, pp. 2581-2589, (2004)
[15]  
El-Sayed Y.Y., Watkins M.M., Fix M., Druzin M.L., Pullen K.M., Caughey A.B., Perinatal outcomes after successful and failed trials of labor after cesarean delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196, pp. 581-585, (2007)
[16]  
Costantine M.M., Fox K., Byers B.D., Mateus J., Ghulmiyyah L.M., Blackwell S., Et al., Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, pp. 1029-1033, (2009)
[17]  
Kwon J.Y., Jo Y.S., Lee G.S., Kim S.J., Shin J.C., Lee Y., Cervical dilatation at the time of cesarean section may affect the success of a subsequent vaginal delivery, Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 11, pp. 1057-1062, (2009)
[18]  
MacDorman M., Declercq E., Menacker F., Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, Clinics in Perinatology, 38, pp. 179-192, (2011)