Enantioselective disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes

被引:29
作者
Miura, M
Kagaya, H
Tada, H
Uno, T
Yasui-Furukori, N
Tateishi, T
Suzuki, T
机构
[1] Akita Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Akita 0108543, Japan
[2] Hirosaki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Hirosaki, Aomori 036, Japan
[3] Hirosaki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Hirosaki, Aomori 036, Japan
关键词
CYP2C19; enantiomer; rabeprazole;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02566.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim Rabeprazole is metabolized to some extent by CYP2C19. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the pharmacokinetics of each rabeprazole enantiomer in three different CYP2C19 genotype groups. Methods Twenty-four healthy subjects, of whom each each were homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) for CYP2C19, participated in our study. After a single oral dose of 20 mg of racemic rabeprazole, the plasma concentrations of the rabeprazole enantiomers were measured over the course of 24 h. Results The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) of (R)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1.8-, 2.2- and 2.4-fold, respectively, greater than those of (S)-rabeprazole; the relative AUC ratios of (R)- and (S)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1 : 1.1 : 2.1 and 1 : 0.9 : 1.5, respectively. The mean maximum plasma concentrations (C-max) of (R)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1.7-, 1.9- and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, than those of the corresponding (S)-enantiomer (P < 0.05). There was no difference between homEMs and PMs in the elimination half-life of (S)-rabeprazole, whereas the elimination half-life of (R)-rabeprazole was significantly longer in PMs than in homEMs [1.7 h (1.4, 2.0) (mean (95% confidence interval)]vs. 0.8 h (0.6, 1.0), respectively, P < 0.0001). Conclusions (R)-Rabeprazole disposition was influenced to a greater degree by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms than was that of (S)-rabeprazole. The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the stereoselective disposition of rabeprazole was less than those of lansoprazole and omeprazole.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 320
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetic studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole [J].
Andersson, T ;
Hassan-Alin, M ;
Hasselgren, G ;
Röhss, K ;
Weidolf, L .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2001, 40 (06) :411-426
[2]  
DEMORAIS SMF, 1994, MOL PHARMACOL, V46, P594
[3]   Clinical significance of the cytochrome P4502C19 genetic polymorphism [J].
Desta, Z ;
Zhao, XJ ;
Shin, JG ;
Flockhart, DA .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2002, 41 (12) :913-958
[4]   INHIBITIONS OF ACID-SECRETION BY E3810 AND OMEPRAZOLE, AND THEIR REVERSAL BY GLUTATHIONE [J].
FUJISAKI, H ;
SHIBATA, H ;
OKETANI, K ;
MURAKAMI, M ;
FUJIMOTO, M ;
WAKABAYASHI, T ;
YAMATSU, I ;
YAMAGUCHI, M ;
SAKAI, H ;
TAKEGUCHI, N .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 42 (02) :321-328
[5]   Pharmacodynamic effects and kinetic disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes [J].
Horai, Y ;
Kimura, M ;
Furuie, H ;
Matsuguma, K ;
Irie, S ;
Koga, Y ;
Nagahama, T ;
Murakami, M ;
Matsui, T ;
Yao, T ;
Urae, A ;
Ishizaki, T .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 15 (06) :793-803
[6]   A new strategy for alkane oxidation with O2 using N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI) as a radical catalyst [J].
Ishii, Y ;
Sakaguchi, S .
CATALYSIS SURVEYS FROM JAPAN, 1999, 3 (01) :27-35
[7]  
Ishizaki T, 1999, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V13, P27
[8]   Stereospecific analysis of omeprazole in human plasma as a probe for CYP2C19 phenotype [J].
Kanazawa, H ;
Okada, A ;
Higaki, M ;
Yokota, H ;
Mashige, F ;
Nakahara, K .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 30 (06) :1817-1824
[9]   Enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole in extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2C19 [J].
Kim, KA ;
Shon, JH ;
Park, JY ;
Yoon, YR ;
Kim, MJ ;
Yun, DH ;
Kim, MK ;
Cha, IJ ;
Hyun, MH ;
Shin, JG .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 72 (01) :90-99
[10]   Pharmacokinetic considerations in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori [J].
Klotz, U .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 38 (03) :243-270