Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) Category 4 Lesions

被引:14
|
作者
Liu, Dandan [1 ,2 ]
Ba, Zhaogui [2 ]
Ni, Xiaoli [2 ]
Wang, Linhong [2 ]
Yu, Dexin [1 ]
Ma, Xiangxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Radiol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Taishan Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Laigang Hosp, Laiwu, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2018年 / 24卷
关键词
Breast; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; BENIGN; SCORE; DWI;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.907000
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. Material/Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 143 patients (150 breast lesions), who were diagnosed by biopsy, and received dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging. The diagnostic efficacies of ADC, Fischer's scoring system, and the Fischer's + ADC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Fischer's scoring system and the Fischer's + ADC were used to subdivide BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. Results: ADC value was negatively correlated with the tumor grade. The AUC of Fischer's + ADC (0.949) was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.855) and Fischer's (0.912) (P=0.0008 and 0.001, respectively). Scored by Fischer's scoring system, Category 4 and 5 indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity and specificity of 98.70% and 65.75%, respectively. Scored by the Fischer's + ADC method, Category 4B and 4C indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity of 97.40% and specificity of 82.19%. Kappa values were 0.63 (ADC), 0.65 (Fischer's), and 0.80 (Fischer's + ADC), respectively. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C were 7.69%, 52.38% and 89.29%, respectively. Conclusions: Fischer's scoring system combined with ADC could reasonably subdivide Category 4 breast lesions with high specificity and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:2180 / 2188
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features
    Mohapatra, Suvendu Kumar
    Mishra, Abhisek
    Sahoo, Tapan Kumar
    Nayak, Rashmita Binod
    Das, Prafulla Kumar
    Nayak, Bhagyalaxmi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01) : 182 - 189
  • [32] Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging
    Ogura, Akio
    Hayakawa, Katsumi
    Miyati, Tosiaki
    Maeda, Fumie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 77 (01) : 185 - 188
  • [33] Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions
    Pinker, K.
    Bickel, H.
    Helbich, T. H.
    Gruber, S.
    Dubsky, P.
    Pluschnig, U.
    Rudas, M.
    Bago-Horvath, Z.
    Weber, M.
    Trattnig, S.
    Bogner, W.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (07) : 1791 - 1802
  • [34] Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values
    Bickel, Hubert
    Pinker, Katja
    Polanec, Stephan
    Magometschnigg, Heinrich
    Wengert, Georg
    Spick, Claudio
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Baltzer, Pascal
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (05) : 1883 - 1892
  • [35] Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 4 Breast Lesions
    Jin, Zhan-Qiang
    Li, Xiu-Ru
    Zhou, Hong-Lian
    Chen, Jie-Xin
    Huang, Xing
    Dai, Hai-Xia
    Li, Jian-Wen
    Chen, Xiao-Dong
    Xu, Xiao-Hong
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2012, 12 (06) : 420 - 427
  • [36] A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
    Meng, Lingsong
    Zhao, Xin
    Lu, Lin
    Xing, Qingna
    Wang, Kaiyu
    Guo, Yafei
    Shang, Honglei
    Chen, Yan
    Huang, Mengyue
    Sun, Yongbing
    Zhang, Xiaoan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [37] Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Mauro
    Purpura, Pierpaolo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso V.
    Picone, Dario
    Dispensa, Nino
    Lunetta, Claudio
    Bruno, Alberto
    Raso, Ludovica
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [38] Dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient on slice position in magnetic resonance diffusion imaging
    Takatsu, Yasuo
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    Suzuki, Yuichi
    Miyati, Tosiaki
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 99 : 41 - 47
  • [39] Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: Clinical indications and breast MRI reporting system
    Ikeda, DM
    Baker, DR
    Daniel, BL
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 12 (06) : 975 - 983
  • [40] Interrater reliability of the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI)
    Ramadan, Zainab A.
    Abdelrazek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek
    Denewar, Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01)