Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) Category 4 Lesions

被引:14
|
作者
Liu, Dandan [1 ,2 ]
Ba, Zhaogui [2 ]
Ni, Xiaoli [2 ]
Wang, Linhong [2 ]
Yu, Dexin [1 ]
Ma, Xiangxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Radiol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Taishan Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Laigang Hosp, Laiwu, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2018年 / 24卷
关键词
Breast; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; BENIGN; SCORE; DWI;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.907000
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to subdivide BI-RADS-MRI (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Category 4 lesions and to evaluate the role of Fischer's scoring system, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Fischer's + ADC in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. Material/Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 143 patients (150 breast lesions), who were diagnosed by biopsy, and received dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted imaging. The diagnostic efficacies of ADC, Fischer's scoring system, and the Fischer's + ADC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Fischer's scoring system and the Fischer's + ADC were used to subdivide BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. Results: ADC value was negatively correlated with the tumor grade. The AUC of Fischer's + ADC (0.949) was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.855) and Fischer's (0.912) (P=0.0008 and 0.001, respectively). Scored by Fischer's scoring system, Category 4 and 5 indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity and specificity of 98.70% and 65.75%, respectively. Scored by the Fischer's + ADC method, Category 4B and 4C indicated a likely malignant threshold with sensitivity of 97.40% and specificity of 82.19%. Kappa values were 0.63 (ADC), 0.65 (Fischer's), and 0.80 (Fischer's + ADC), respectively. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS 4A, 4B, and 4C were 7.69%, 52.38% and 89.29%, respectively. Conclusions: Fischer's scoring system combined with ADC could reasonably subdivide Category 4 breast lesions with high specificity and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:2180 / 2188
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prevent Biopsy or Change the Management of BI-RADS® Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Turnaoglu, Hale
    Ozturk, Emine
    Yucesoy, Cuneyt
    Teber, Mehmet Akif
    Turan, Aynur
    Ozbalci, Aysu Basak
    Seker, Ebru Gaye
    Onal, Binnur
    Hekimoglu, Baki
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 80 (05) : 505 - 512
  • [2] Subcategory classifications of Breast Imaging and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on MRI
    Maya Honda
    Masako Kataoka
    Kosuke Kawaguchi
    Mami Iima
    Kanae Kawai Miyake
    Ayami Ohno Kishimoto
    Rie Ota
    Akane Ohashi
    Masakazu Toi
    Yuji Nakamoto
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2021, 39 : 56 - 65
  • [3] Subcategory classifications of Breast Imaging and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on MRI
    Honda, Maya
    Kataoka, Masako
    Kawaguchi, Kosuke
    Iima, Mami
    Miyake, Kanae Kawai
    Kishimoto, Ayami Ohno
    Ota, Rie
    Ohashi, Akane
    Toi, Masakazu
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) : 56 - 65
  • [4] Can magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis change the breast imaging reporting and data system category of breast lesions?
    Uysal, Emine
    Topaloglu, Omer Faruk
    Ari, Ayse
    Ozer, Halil
    Koplay, Mustafa
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2023, 97 : 44 - 49
  • [5] Sonographic Characteristics and Pathology Correlation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 Lesions
    Khan, Poonum
    Masroor, Imrana
    Alam, Muhammad S.
    Salam, Abdus
    Ali, Yasir
    Khan, Muhammad Salman
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [6] Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prevent Biopsy or Change the Management of BI-RADS® Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Hale Turnaoglu
    Emine Ozturk
    Cuneyt Yucesoy
    Mehmet Akif Teber
    Aynur Turan
    Aysu Basak Ozbalci
    Ebru Gaye Seker
    Binnur Onal
    Baki Hekimoglu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2018, 80 : 505 - 512
  • [7] Predicting Breast Cancer in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Ultrasound Category 4 or 5 Lesions: A Nomogram Combining Radiomics and BI-RADS
    Luo, Wei-quan
    Huang, Qing-xiu
    Huang, Xiao-wen
    Hu, Hang-tong
    Zeng, Fu-qiang
    Wang, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [8] Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: correlation with pathological findings
    Aseret Ramirez-Galvan, Yazmin
    Cardona-Huerta, Servando
    Ibarra-Fombona, Elfa
    Elizondo-Riojas, Guillermo
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [9] Elastography Assisted BI-RADS in the Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4a Lesions in China
    Tang, Lei
    Wang, Yuqun
    Gong, Huiling
    Chen, Man
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (02) : 453 - 461
  • [10] Value of breast MRI omics features and clinical characteristics in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions: an analysis of radiomics-based diagnosis
    Cui, Qian
    Sun, Liang
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhao, Zimu
    Li, Shuo
    Liu, Yajie
    Ge, Hongwei
    Qin, Dongxue
    Zhao, Yiping
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (22)