Decomposing Group Differences of Latent Means of Ordered Categorical Variables within a Genetic Factor Model

被引:8
作者
Cho, Seung Bin [1 ]
Wood, Phillip K. [1 ]
Heath, Andrew C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Genetic factor model; Latent response variable formulation; Ordered categorical variables; Mplus; Twins; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE; AGE-DIFFERENCES; TWIN DATA; BEHAVIOR; PERSONALITY; GROWTH; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10519-008-9237-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A genetic factor model is introduced for decomposition of group differences of the means of phenotypic behavior as well as individual differences when the research variables under consideration are ordered categorical. The model employs the general Genetic Factor Model proposed by Neale and Cardon (Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families, 1992) and, more specifically, the extension proposed by Dolan et al. (Behav Genet 22: 319-335, 1992) which enables decomposition of group differences of the means associated with genetic and environmental factors. Using a latent response variable (LRV) formulation (Muth,n and Asparouhov, Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus web notes: No. 4, Version 5, 2002), proportional differences of response categories between groups are modeled within the genetic factor model in terms of the distributional differences of latent response variables assumed to underlie the observed ordered categorical variables. Use of the proposed model is illustrated using a measure of conservatism in the data collected from the Australian Twin Registry.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 122
页数:22
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]  
Bollen KA, 2006, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1
[3]   AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURE FOR LINKING METRICS AND ASSESSING ITEM BIAS IN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY [J].
CANDELL, GL ;
DRASGOW, F .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1988, 12 (03) :253-260
[4]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS OF DICHOTOMIZED VARIABLES [J].
CHRISTOFFERSSON, A .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1975, 40 (01) :5-32
[5]   Behavior problems among children from different family structures: The influence of genetic self-selection [J].
Cleveland, HH ;
Wiebe, RP ;
van den Oord, EJCG ;
Rowe, DC .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 71 (03) :733-751
[6]   DECOMPOSITION OF MULTIVARIATE PHENOTYPIC MEANS IN MULTIGROUP GENETIC COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS [J].
DOLAN, CV ;
MOLENAAR, PCM ;
BOOMSMA, DI .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1992, 22 (03) :319-335
[7]   TESTING SPECIFIC HYPOTHESES CONCERNING LATENT GROUP-DIFFERENCES IN MULTI-GROUP COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS WITH STRUCTURED MEANS [J].
DOLAN, CV ;
MOLENAAR, PCM .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1994, 29 (03) :203-222
[8]   LISREL ANALYSIS OF TWIN DATA WITH STRUCTURED MEANS [J].
DOLAN, CV ;
MOLENAAR, PCM ;
BOOMSMA, DI .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1989, 19 (01) :51-62
[9]   SIMULTANEOUS GENETIC-ANALYSIS OF LONGITUDINAL MEANS AND COVARIANCE STRUCTURE IN THE SIMPLEX MODEL USING TWIN DATA [J].
DOLAN, CV ;
MOLENAAR, PCM ;
BOOMSMA, DI .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1991, 21 (01) :49-65
[10]   STUDY OF THE MEASUREMENT BIAS OF 2 STANDARDIZED PSYCHOLOGICAL-TESTS [J].
DRASGOW, F .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (01) :19-29