A Multifaceted Independent Performance Analysis of Facial Subspace Recognition Algorithms

被引:11
作者
Bajwa, Usama Ijaz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Taj, Imtiaz Ahmad [2 ]
Anwar, Muhammad Waqas [1 ]
Wang, Xuan [4 ]
机构
[1] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Abbottabad, Pakistan
[2] Muhammad Ali Jinnah Univ, Vis & Pattern Recognit Syst Res Grp, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] CASE, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Shenzen Grad Sch, Harbin Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
FACE-RECOGNITION; 2-DIMENSIONAL PCA; COMPONENT; REPRESENTATION; LAPLACIANFACES; EIGENFACES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0056510
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Face recognition has emerged as the fastest growing biometric technology and has expanded a lot in the last few years. Many new algorithms and commercial systems have been proposed and developed. Most of them use Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as a base for their techniques. Different and even conflicting results have been reported by researchers comparing these algorithms. The purpose of this study is to have an independent comparative analysis considering both performance and computational complexity of six appearance based face recognition algorithms namely PCA, 2DPCA, A2DPCA, (2D)(2)PCA, LPP and 2DLPP under equal working conditions. This study was motivated due to the lack of unbiased comprehensive comparative analysis of some recent subspace methods with diverse distance metric combinations. For comparison with other studies, FERET, ORL and YALE databases have been used with evaluation criteria as of FERET evaluations which closely simulate real life scenarios. A comparison of results with previous studies is performed and anomalies are reported. An important contribution of this study is that it presents the suitable performance conditions for each of the algorithms under consideration.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   2D and 3D face recognition: A survey [J].
Abate, Andrea F. ;
Nappi, Michele ;
Riccio, Daniel ;
Sabatino, Gabriele .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2007, 28 (14) :1885-1906
[2]  
Baek K, 2002, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, P824
[3]  
Bajwa U, 2011, FACERECEVAL MATLAB B
[4]   A comprehensive comparative performance analysis of Laplacianfaces and Eigenfaces for face recognition [J].
Bajwa, U. I. ;
Taj, I. A. ;
Bhatti, Z. E. .
IMAGING SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2011, 59 (01) :32-40
[5]   Face recognition by independent component analysis [J].
Bartlett, MS ;
Movellan, JR ;
Sejnowski, TJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2002, 13 (06) :1450-1464
[6]   Independent component representations for face recognition [J].
Bartlett, MS ;
Lades, HM ;
Sejnowski, TJ .
HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING III, 1998, 3299 :528-539
[7]   Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection [J].
Belhumeur, PN ;
Hespanha, JP ;
Kriegman, DJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 19 (07) :711-720
[8]  
Beveridge JR, 2001, PROC CVPR IEEE, P535
[9]  
Bhatti Z E, 2009, P IEEE INT MUL C, P1
[10]  
Bhatti Z E, 2009, FACEREC PROVIDES BAS