Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality

被引:216
作者
McGuire, Jean [1 ]
Morton, Lois Wright [1 ]
Cast, Alicia D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Sociol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Sociol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Productivist; Conservationist; Farmer identity; Water quality; Performance-based management; Farmer decision-making; CONSERVATION; ADOPTION; AGRICULTURE; STEWARDSHIP; AGENCY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-012-9381-y
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
All farmers have their own version of what it means to be a good farmer. For many US farmers a large portion of their identity is defined by the high input, high output production systems they manage to produce food, fiber or fuel. However, the unintended consequences of highly productivist systems are often increased soil erosion and the pollution of ground and surface water. A large number of farmers have conservationist identities within their good farmer identity, however their conservation goals often need to be activated to rebalance the production-conservation meanings they give to their roles in society. In this paper we analyze US Cornbelt farmer interviews and surveys to trace how the performance-based environmental management process can be used to influence the farmer social identity and shift the overall good farmer identity towards a stronger conservationist standard. We find the continuous feedback loop in performance-based environmental management mimics the hierarchically organized feedback control processes of identity verification and can be used to help farmers activate their conservationist farmer identities at the person, role, and social levels to establish new norms for the practice of more sustainable agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 69
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[41]  
Pelkmans L., 2005, BIOFUELS US
[42]  
Pfeffer MJ, 2011, PATHWAYS FOR GETTING TO BETTER WATER QUALITY: THE CITIZEN EFFECT, P109, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7282-8_9
[43]  
Pretty Jules., 1995, REGENERATING AGR POL
[44]   Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature [J].
Prokopy, L. S. ;
Floress, K. ;
Klotthor-Weinkauf, D. ;
Baumgart-Getz, A. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2008, 63 (05) :300-311
[45]   The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption [J].
Reimer, Adam P. ;
Thompson, Aaron W. ;
Prokopy, Linda S. .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2012, 29 (01) :29-40
[46]  
Ribaudo M., 2011, REDUCING AGR NITROGE
[47]  
Ribaudo M., 2006, AGR RESOURCES ENV IN, V2006, P33
[48]   Soil conservation in Swiss agriculture-Approaching abstract and symbolic meanings in farmers' life-worlds [J].
Schneider, Flurina ;
Ledermann, Thomas ;
Fry, Patricia ;
Rist, Stephan .
LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (02) :332-339
[49]  
Schnitke Gary, 2011, RELATIONSHIP ANHYDRO
[50]   People in Ecosystems/Watershed Integration: A dynamic watershed tool for linking agroecosystem outputs to land use and land cover [J].
Schulte, Lisa ;
Donahey, James ;
Gran, Luke ;
Isenhart, Thomas ;
Tyndall, John .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2010, 65 (02) :33A-36A