A multicenter, phased, cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units

被引:90
作者
Marsteller, Jill A. [1 ,2 ]
Sexton, J. Bryan [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Yea-Jen [1 ]
Hsiao, Chun-Ju [1 ]
Holzmueller, Christine G. [2 ]
Pronovost, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, David A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
catheter-related infections; evidence-based practice; intensive care units; prevention and control; quality improvement; randomized controlled trial; SAFETY; HOSPITALS; CULTURE; DESIGN; TOOL;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825fd4d8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the causal effects of an intervention proven effective in pre-post studies in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Design: We conducted a multicenter, phased, cluster-randomized controlled trial in which hospitals were randomized into two groups. The intervention group started in March 2007 and the control group started in October 2007; the study period ended September 2008. Baseline data for both groups are from 2006. Setting: Forty-five intensive care units from 35 hospitals in two Adventist healthcare systems. Interventions: A multifaceted intervention involving evidence-based practices to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections and the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program to improve safety, teamwork, and communication. Measurements and Results: We measured central line-associated bloodstream infections per 1,000 central line days and reported quarterly rates. Baseline average central line-associated bloodstream infections per 1,000 central line days was 4.48 and 2.71, for the intervention and control groups (p=.28), respectively. By October to December 2007, the infection rate declined to 1.33 in the intervention group compared to 2.16 in the control group (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.19; p=.003; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.57). The intervention group sustained rates <1/1,000 central line days at 19 months (an 81% reduction). The control group also reduced infection rates to <1/1,000 central line days (a 69% reduction) at 12 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a causal relationship between the multifaceted intervention and the reduced central line-associated bloodstream infections. Both groups decreased infection rates after implementation and sustained these results over time, replicating the results found in previous, pre-post studies of this multifaceted intervention and providing further evidence that most central line-associated bloodstream infections are preventable. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 2933-2939)
引用
收藏
页码:2933 / 2939
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OVERVIEW 100000 LIVE
[2]   Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit [J].
Berenholtz, SM ;
Pronovost, PJ ;
Lipsett, PA ;
Hobson, D ;
Earsing, K ;
Farley, JE ;
Milanovich, S ;
Garrett-Mayer, E ;
Winters, BD ;
Rubin, HR ;
Dorman, T ;
Perl, TM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (10) :2014-2020
[3]   An Intensive Care Unit Quality Improvement Collaborative in Nine Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals: Reducing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Rates [J].
Bonello, Robert S. ;
Fletcher, Carol E. ;
Becker, William K. ;
Clutter, Kay L. ;
Arjes, Shelley L. ;
Cook, Jennifer J. ;
Petzel, Robert A. .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2008, 34 (11) :639-645
[4]   Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in US Intensive Care Units, 1997-2007 [J].
Burton, Deron C. ;
Edwards, Jonathan R. ;
Horan, Teresa C. ;
Jernigan, John A. ;
Fridkin, Scott K. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (07) :727-736
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2005, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V54, P1013
[6]   Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT) [J].
Chan, Kitty S. ;
Hsu, Yea-Jen ;
Lubomski, Lisa H. ;
Marsteller, Jill A. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
[7]   Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. [J].
Concato, J ;
Shah, N ;
Horwitz, RI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1887-1892
[8]   Some aspects of the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials [J].
Donner, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1998, 47 :95-113
[9]   National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: Data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009 [J].
Edwards, Jonathan R. ;
Peterson, Kelly D. ;
Mu, Yi ;
Banerjee, Shailendra ;
Allen-Bridson, Katherine ;
Morrell, Gloria ;
Dudeck, Margaret A. ;
Pollock, Daniel A. ;
Horan, Teresa C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2009, 37 (10) :783-805
[10]  
Eldridge Sandra M, 2004, Clin Trials, V1, P80, DOI 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr