Main Factors Affecting Post-Harvest Grain Loss during the Sales Process: A Survey in Nine Provinces of China

被引:22
作者
Chen, Xiujuan [1 ]
Wu, Linhai [1 ]
Shan, Lijie [1 ]
Zang, Qiuxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Inst Food Safety Risk Management, Wuxi 214122, Peoples R China
关键词
food security; post-harvest grain loss; sales process; survey; Tobit regression model; China; FOOD SECURITY; POLICY; FARMERS; WASTE;
D O I
10.3390/su10030661
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ensuring food security has always been a top priority of the Chinese government. However, China's grain supply is facing challenges due to limited resources for grain production and the growth of domestic grain consumption. Reducing post-harvest grain loss represents one of the most realistic and effective ways to ensure grain security in China. In view of the importance of grain sales in the post-harvest period, we conducted a survey, interviewing 1890 grain sellers across 54 regions in 9 provinces of China, to investigate the factors affecting post-harvest grain loss during sales. The results of the survey show that grain storage conditions have the greatest impact on post-harvest grain loss, followed by transportation. Display and sales have the least impact on grain loss. The Tobit regression model was used to analyze the main factors affecting post-harvest grain loss during sales. The findings suggest that the seller's education level, years of working as a seller, the conditions of grain storage, and the supply and management level of public facilities in the market were negatively correlated with grain loss in the sales process, whereas the seller's age, the separation of sales shops and storage warehouses, and the fall season were positively correlated with grain loss. Policy implications are also provided for potential future policy decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Food security policy options for China: Lessons from other countries [J].
Anderson, Kym ;
Strutt, Anna .
FOOD POLICY, 2014, 49 :50-58
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, QUAL ASSUR SAF CROP, DOI [DOI 10.1111/j.1757-837X.2012.00151.x, 10.1111/j.1757-837X.2012.00151, DOI 10.1111/J.1757-837X.2012.00151]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SW 240 POL DAT SHEET
[4]  
[Anonymous], ISSUES AGR EC
[5]  
[Anonymous], J AGR SCI TECHNOL B
[6]  
[Anonymous], J HENAN U TECHNOL
[7]  
[Anonymous], CEREAL FOOD IND
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J HUAZHONG AGR U SOC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AGR EC
[10]  
[Anonymous], J AGR MECH R