Safety profile comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and corticosteroids

被引:11
作者
Cristelli, M. P. [1 ]
Tedesco-Silva, H. [1 ]
Medina-Pestana, J. O. [1 ]
Franco, M. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp Rim & Hipertensao, Transplant Div, BR-04038002 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
kidney transplant; immunosuppression; infection; acute rejection; mycophenolic acid; azathioprine; CADAVERIC RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; ACUTE REJECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMENS; ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; MOFETIL; CYCLOSPORINE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1111/tid.12095
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Debate is increasing on whether mycophenolic acid (MPA) provides survival benefits comparable to azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. Methods. This retrospective cohort study compared safety and efficacy of AZA (n = 662) vs. MPA (n = 267) in low- immunologicrisk kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids between 1998 and 2007. Primary outcomes were treatment discontinuation and infection. Secondary endpoints included survival free from biopsy- proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, and renal function. Results. The 5- year survival free of treatment discontinuation was higher in the MPA compared to the AZA group (74.1% vs. 60.3%, P < 0.001). MPA was discontinued exclusively because of adverse events (16.4%), while AZA was discontinued primarily for lack of efficacy (21.2%). In univariable analysis, MPA was associated with higher incidence of total (561.5 vs. 667.5 episodes/1000 person- year, P < 0.001), bacterial (167 vs. 158 episodes/1000 person- years, P = 0.001), and viral infections (83.2 vs. 100.4 episodes/1000 personyears, P = 0.001), but this association was not confirmed in multivariable analysis. Over 29% of viral infections in the AZA group occurred after conversion to MPA. A high incidence of tuberculosis was observed (2.9 episodes/1000 person- years) with a higher incidence (but not a statistically significant difference) in the AZA group. No significant differences were found in patient survival (90% vs. 89%, P = 0.78) or graft survival (81% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.08), but infection accounted for > 50% of all deaths. Conclusion. The type of antimetabolite, AZA or MPA, was not independently associated with any safety or efficacy outcome 5 years after transplantation, suggesting that AZA is still a viable option for low- risk KTR receiving TAC and steroids.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TRANSPLANTATION
[2]   Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in HIV-Infected Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cattamanchi, Adithya ;
Smith, Rachel ;
Steingart, Karen R. ;
Metcalfe, John Z. ;
Date, Anand ;
Coleman, Courtney ;
Marston, Barbara J. ;
Huang, Laurence ;
Hopewell, Philip C. ;
Pai, Madhukar .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2011, 56 (03) :230-238
[3]  
CDC, 2011, Reported Tuberculosis in the United States 2010
[4]   Mycophenolate Versus Azathioprine for Kidney Transplantation: A 15-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial [J].
Clayton, Philip A. ;
McDonald, Stephen P. ;
Chapman, Jeremy R. ;
Chadban, Steven J. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (02) :152-158
[5]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[6]   Patient survival and cardiovascular risk after kidney transplantation: The challenge of diabetes [J].
Cosio, F. G. ;
Hickson, L. J. ;
Griffin, M. D. ;
Stegall, M. D. ;
Kudva, Y. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 (03) :593-599
[7]   Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study [J].
Dudley, C ;
Pohanka, E ;
Riad, H ;
Dedochova, J ;
Wijngaard, P ;
Sutter, C ;
Silva, HT .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (04) :466-475
[8]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[9]   Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients - A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection [J].
Halloran, P ;
Mathew, T ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Groth, C ;
Hooftman, L ;
Barker, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (01) :39-47
[10]  
Johnson C, 2000, TRANSPLANTATION, V69, P834