The direct anterior approach to the hip revision

被引:0
|
作者
Nogler, M. [1 ]
Mayr, E. [1 ]
Krismer, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Univ Klin Orthopad, Abt Expt Orthopad, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
来源
OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE | 2012年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
Direct anterior approach; Total hip replacement; Arthroplasty; Surgical revision; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; ARTHROPLASTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00064-011-0113-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this paper is to describe a minimally invasive approach to revision total hip arthroplasty. Indications for revision hip arthroplasty are septic or aseptic loosening of one or both components of a hip arthroplasty. In revisions the direct anterior approach (DAA) allows for a small incision if only the cup has to be revised or in cases of stem revision; the femoral preparation can be performed strictly endofemorally from the proximal direction. The gluteal muscles can be preserved whether the approach is limited to the original interval between the musculus tensor fasciae latae and the rectus, or has to be extended. If preservation of the gluteal muscles is desired, the DAA and its extension are the method of choice. For endofemoral revision other than detachment of the musculus tensor fasciae latae, hyperextension and adduction of the operated leg are important. If these cannot be achieved, an alternative operative strategy or a different approach should be considered. As this approach allows for extensions proximally and distally along the femur, it competes with lateral approaches to the hip joint and femur, and does not have additional specific contraindications. The availability of specific curved, angulated, or offset instruments is mandatory. The starting point of the incision is found two fingerbreadths lateral and two finger breadths distal to the anterior superior iliac spine. The fascia of the musculus tensor fasciae latae is incised sharply at its midpoint. The interval is prepared strictly subfacially and medially to the musculus tensor fasciae latae to expose the hip joint. For this approach we don't have any specific recommendations. Postoperative management depends mostly on the extension of the approach and the type of reconstruction performed. If the approach can be limited to the minimally invasive direct anterior portal, reduced muscle damage should result in faster rehabilitation. The retrospective analysis was performed on the data obtained from 48 revision operations with the minimally invasive direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty. The median cut-suture time was 108 min (42-282 min); patients spent a median time of 10 days (4-33 days) in the hospital from the day of the operation. The most common revision operations were cup replacement with an augmentation ring (13 out of 48), stem revision (11 out of 48), cup replacement (9 out of 48), H-TEP complete (3 out of 48), removing of ossifications (2 out of 48), cap revision (2 out of 48) and H-TEP removal with insertion of a spacer (2 out of 48). Complications attributed to the procedure were reported in 9 of the 48 cases: 1 wound-healing disorder, 1 late infection, 1 hematoma, 1 deep vein thrombosis, 1 perforation (by the spacer) and 1 ossification. Two patients were diagnosed with trochanteric pain syndrome. In one case an implant loosening was diagnosed 12 months after the revision.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The minimalinvasive direct anterior approach in aseptic cup revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up
    Marc Dominique Horsthemke
    Christoph Koenig
    Georg Gosheger
    Jendrik Hardes
    Steffen Hoell
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2019, 139 : 121 - 126
  • [22] The minimalinvasive direct anterior approach in aseptic cup revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up
    Horsthemke, Marc Dominique
    Koenig, Christoph
    Gosheger, Georg
    Hardes, Jendrik
    Hoell, Steffen
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [23] The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach to the hip: the "other" anterior approach to the hip
    Civinini, Roberto
    Lepri, Andrea Cozzi
    Carulli, Christian
    Matassi, Fabrizio
    Villano, Marco
    Innocenti, Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [24] Proximal femoral replacement using the direct anterior approach to the hip
    Thaler, Martin
    Manson, Theodore T.
    Holzapfel, Boris Michael
    Moskal, Joseph
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2022, 34 (03): : 218 - 230
  • [25] Direct anterior compared to posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fractures
    Wu, Kevin A.
    Krez, Alexandra N.
    Anastasio, Albert T.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 15 (06):
  • [26] Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip Does Not Increase the Risk for Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Shohat, Noam
    Goswami, Karan
    Clarkson, Samuel
    Chisari, Emanuele
    Breckenridge, Leigham
    Gursay, D'Andrew
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (06) : 2038 - 2043
  • [27] An anatomic consideration of the femoral nerve during direct anterior hip approach: A cadaveric study
    Witayakom, Witchaporn
    Sukhonthamarn, Kamolsak
    Kosuwon, Weerachai
    Apinyankul, Rit
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2024, 46 (06) : 733 - 738
  • [28] Hip Resurfacing Utilizing the Direct Anterior Approach
    Goltzer, Oren
    Guild, George N., III
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 36 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [29] Debate on direct-anterior vs posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty: The authors' insights
    Kumar, Deepak
    Thami, Tarkik
    Nishani, Manjunath
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 15 (05): : 486 - 488
  • [30] Posterior versus direct anterior approach in revision hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type plate
    Baba, Tomonori
    Homma, Yasuhiro
    Jinnai, Yuta
    Tanabe, Hiroki
    Banno, Sammy
    Watari, Taiji
    Kaneko, Kazuo
    SICOT-J, 2020, 6