Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis

被引:43
作者
Wastlund, David [1 ,2 ]
Moraitis, Alexandros A. [3 ]
Dacey, Alison [3 ]
Sovio, Ulla [3 ]
Wilson, Edward C. F. [1 ,4 ]
Smith, Gordon C. S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Comprehens Biomed Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Hlth Econ Grp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION; PLANNED VAGINAL BIRTH; OUTCOME PREDICTION POP; CESAREAN-SECTION; GROWTH RESTRICTION; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; TERM; RISK; DELIVERY; LABOR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002778
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Despite the relative ease with which breech presentation can be identified through ultrasound screening, the assessment of foetal presentation at term is often based on clinical examination only. Due to limitations in this approach, many women present in labour with an undiagnosed breech presentation, with increased risk of foetal morbidity and mortality. This study sought to determine the cost effectiveness of universal ultrasound scanning for breech presentation near term (36 weeks of gestational age [wkGA]) in nulliparous women. Methods and findings The Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study was a prospective cohort study between January 14, 2008 and July 31, 2012, including 3,879 nulliparous women who attended for a research screening ultrasound examination at 36 wkGA. Foetal presentation was assessed and compared for the groups with and without a clinically indicated ultrasound. Where breech presentation was detected, an external cephalic version (ECV) was routinely offered. If the ECV was unsuccessful or not performed, the women were offered either planned cesarean section at 39 weeks or attempted vaginal breech delivery. To compare the likelihood of different mode of deliveries and associated long-term health outcomes for universal ultrasound to current practice, a probabilistic economic simulation model was constructed. Parameter values were obtained from the POP study, and costs were mainly obtained from the English National Health Service (NHS). One hundred seventy-nine out of 3,879 women (4.6%) were diagnosed with breech presentation at 36 weeks. For most women (96), there had been no prior suspicion of noncephalic presentation. ECV was attempted for 84 (46.9%) women and was successful in 12 (success rate: 14.3%). Overall, 19 of the 179 women delivered vaginally (10.6%), 110 delivered by elective cesarean section (ELCS) (61.5%) and 50 delivered by emergency cesarean section (EMCS) (27.9%). There were no women with undiagnosed breech presentation in labour in the entire cohort. On average, 40 scans were needed per detection of a previously undiagnosed breech presentation. The economic analysis indicated that, compared to current practice, universal late-pregnancy ultrasound would identify around 14,826 otherwise undiagnosed breech presentations across England annually. It would also reduce EMCS and vaginal breech deliveries by 0.7 and 1.0 percentage points, respectively: around 4,196 and 6,061 deliveries across England annually. Universal ultrasound would also prevent 7.89 neonatal mortalities annually. The strategy would be cost effective if foetal presentation could be assessed for 19.80 or less per woman. Limitations to this study included that foetal presentation was revealed to all women and that the health economic analysis may be altered by parity. Conclusions According to our estimates, universal late pregnancy ultrasound in nulliparous women (1) would virtually eliminate undiagnosed breech presentation, (2) would be expected to reduce foetal mortality in breech presentation, and (3) would be cost effective if foetal presentation could be assessed for less than 19.80 per woman.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]   Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study) [J].
Henrichs, Jens ;
Verfaille, Viki ;
Viester, Laura ;
Westerneng, Myrte ;
Molewijk, Bert ;
Franx, Arie ;
van der Horst, Henriette ;
Bosmans, Judith E. ;
de Jonge, Ank ;
Jellema, Petra .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
[22]   External cephalic version for breech presentation at term [J].
Hofmeyr, G. Justus ;
Kulier, Regina ;
West, Helen M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04)
[23]  
Hofmeyr GJ, 2015, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD000082.pub3]
[24]   Vaginal Breech Birth: Can We Move Beyond the Term Breech Trial? [J].
Hunter, Linda A. .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (03) :320-327
[25]   Management of Breech Presentation [J].
Impey, L. W. M. ;
Murphy, D. J. ;
Griffiths, M. ;
Penna, L. K. ;
Adamson, K. ;
Akaba, G. ;
Azria, E. ;
Barrett, J. F. R. ;
Bisits, A. ;
Blum, R. ;
Bodle, J. F. ;
Bogner, G. ;
Burnett, M. ;
Cochrane, V. ;
Danielian, P. J. ;
Davidson, J. ;
de Hundt, M. ;
Diyaf, A. ;
Barnes, H. Dresner ;
Evans, J. ;
Fernando, R. ;
Fischbein, S. J. ;
Grace, N. ;
Gyte, G. ;
Hinshaw, H. K. S. ;
Horner, J. ;
Kumar, B. ;
Kumar, G. ;
McGregor, E. G. ;
Prochaska, E. ;
Reitter, A. ;
Thornton, J. G. ;
Uddin, S. G. ;
Vendittelli, F. ;
Walker, S. ;
Weiniger, C. F. ;
Gupta, M. ;
Owen, P. ;
Thomson, A. J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (07) :E152-E177
[26]  
Impey LWM., 2017, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V124, pe178
[27]   A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital [J].
James, M ;
Hunt, K ;
Burr, R ;
Johanson, R .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2001, 1 (1)
[28]   Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Keag, Oonagh E. ;
Norman, Jane E. ;
Stock, Sarah J. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (01)
[29]   Labour Outcomes After Successful External Cephalic Version Compared With Spontaneous Cephalic Version [J].
Krueger, Samantha ;
Simioni, Julia ;
Griffith, Lauren E. ;
Hutton, Eileen K. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2018, 40 (01) :61-67
[30]   Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: A prospective study [J].
Lau, TK ;
Lo, KWK ;
Wan, D ;
Rogers, MS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (07) :798-802