Sensitivity analysis of data-driven groundwater forecasts to hydroclimatic controls in irrigated croplands

被引:28
作者
Amaranto, Alessandro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pianosi, Francesca [4 ]
Solomatine, Dimitri [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Corzo, Gerald [2 ]
Munoz-Arriola, Francisco [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Hydroinformat Chair Grp, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Elect Informat & Bioengn, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Water Resources Sect, Delft, Netherlands
[6] RAS, Water Problem Inst, Moscow, Russia
[7] Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Groundwater forecasts; Artificial neural network; Uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; INPUT VARIABLE SELECTION; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES; MODELING TECHNIQUES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; USE EFFICIENCY; PART; HYDROLOGY; DEPLETION; MAIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124957
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the last decades, advancements in computational science have greatly expanded the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in hydrogeology, including applications on groundwater forecast, variable selection, extended lead-times, and regime-specific analysis. However, ANN-model performance often omits the sensitivity to observational uncertainties in hydroclimate forcings. The goal of this paper is to implement a data-driven modeling framework for assessing the sensitivity of ANN-based groundwater forecasts to the uncertainties in observational inputs across space, time, and hydrological regimes. The objectives are two-folded. The first objective is to couple an ANN model with the PAWN sensitivity analysis (SA). The second objective is to evaluate the scale- and process-dependent sensitivities of groundwater forecasts to hydroclimate inputs, computing the sensitivity index in groundwater wells (1) across the whole time-series (for the global sensitivity analysis); (2) across the output sub-regions with conditions of water deficit and water surplus (for the 'regional' sensitivity analysis); and (3) at each time step (for the time-varying sensitivity analysis). The implementation of the ANN-PAWN occurs in 68 wells across the Northern High Plains aquifer, USA, with pre-time-step rainfall, evapotranspiration, snowmelt, streamflow, and groundwater measurements as inputs. Results show that evapotranspiration and rainfall are the major sources of uncertainty, with the latter being particularly relevant in water surplus conditions and the former in water deficit conditions. The time-varying sensitivity analysis leads to the identification of localized sensitivities to other sources of uncertainty, as snowmelt in spring or river flow during the annual peak period at the groundwater level.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting
    Abrahart, Robert J.
    Anctil, Francois
    Coulibaly, Paulin
    Dawson, Christian W.
    Mount, Nick J.
    See, Linda M.
    Shamseldin, Asaad Y.
    Solomatine, Dimitri P.
    Toth, Elena
    Wilby, Robert L.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 36 (04): : 480 - 513
  • [2] Aeschbach-Hertig W, 2012, NAT GEOSCI, V5, P853, DOI [10.1038/ngeo1617, 10.1038/NGEO1617]
  • [3] A Spatially Enhanced Data-Driven Multimodel to Improve Groundwater Forecasts in the High Plains Aquifer, USA
    Amaranto, A.
    Munoz-Arriola, F.
    Solomatine, D. P.
    Corzo, G.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (07) : 5941 - 5961
  • [4] Semi-seasonal groundwater forecast using multiple data-driven models in an irrigated cropland
    Amaranto, Alessandro
    Munoz-Arriola, Francisco
    Corzo, Gerald
    Solomatine, Dimitri P.
    Meyer, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2018, 20 (06) : 1227 - 1246
  • [5] Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models
    Barzegar, Rahim
    Fijani, Elham
    Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari
    Tziritis, Evangelos
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 599 : 20 - 31
  • [6] Bergmeir C, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V46, P1
  • [7] Machine learning approach to modeling sediment transport
    Bhattacharya, B.
    Price, R. K.
    Solomatine, D. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (04) : 440 - 450
  • [8] Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 2. Case study: forecasting salinity in a river
    Bowden, GJ
    Maier, HR
    Dandy, GC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 301 (1-4) : 93 - 107
  • [9] A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations
    Coppola, EA
    Rana, AJ
    Poulton, MM
    Szidarovszky, F
    Uhl, VW
    [J]. GROUND WATER, 2005, 43 (02) : 231 - 241
  • [10] Baseflow separation techniques for modular artificial neural network modelling in flow forecasting
    Corzo, Gerald
    Solomatine, Dimitri
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2007, 52 (03): : 491 - 507