The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:101
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [61] Roles of intermediaries in supporting eco-innovation
    Kanda, Wisdom
    Hjelm, Olof
    Clausen, Jens
    Bienkowska, Dzamila
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 205 : 1006 - 1016
  • [62] Kemp R., 2007, UM Merit, Maastricht, V10
  • [63] The missing links? The indirect impacts of drivers on eco-innovation
    Keshminder, J. S.
    del Rio, Pablo
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (05) : 1100 - 1118
  • [64] On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK
    Kesidou, Effie
    Demirel, Pelin
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (05) : 862 - 870
  • [65] Foreign versus domestic institutional investors in emerging markets: Who contributes more to firm-specific information flow?
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Yi, Cheong H.
    [J]. CHINA JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [66] Intermediaries driving eco-innovation in SMEs: a qualitative investigation
    Klewitz, Johanna
    Zeyen, Anica
    Hansen, Erik G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 15 (04) : 442 - +
  • [67] Kochhar R, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P73, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199601)17:1<73::AID-SMJ795>3.0.CO
  • [68] 2-N
  • [69] Blockholder dispersion and firm value
    Konijn, Sander J. J.
    Kraussl, Roman
    Lucas, Andre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2011, 17 (05) : 1330 - 1339
  • [70] HUMAN-RESOURCE SYSTEMS AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - A COMPETENCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE
    LADO, AA
    WILSON, MC
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) : 699 - 727