The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:108
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[21]   Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs [J].
Cecere, Grazia ;
Corrocher, Nicoletta ;
Mancusi, Maria Luisa .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (01) :285-302
[22]   Monitoring: Which institutions matter? [J].
Chen, Xia ;
Harford, Jarrad ;
Li, Kai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 86 (02) :279-305
[23]   Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies [J].
Chen, Xiaohong ;
Yi, Na ;
Zhang, Lu ;
Li, Dayuan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 :304-311
[24]   An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance [J].
Cox, P ;
Brammer, S ;
Millington, A .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2004, 52 (01) :27-43
[25]   Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises [J].
Dam, Lammertjan ;
Scholtens, Bert .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 118 (01) :117-126
[26]   The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D [J].
David, P ;
Hitt, MA ;
Gimeno, J .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (01) :144-157
[27]   Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand [J].
De Massis, Alfredo ;
Audretsch, David ;
Uhlaner, Lorraine ;
Kammerlander, Nadine .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (01) :125-146
[28]   What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods [J].
del Rio, Pablo ;
Penasco, Cristina ;
Romero-Jordan, Desiderio .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :2158-2170
[29]   Policy Strategies to Promote Eco-Innovation [J].
del Rio, Pablo ;
Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier ;
Konnola, Totti .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 14 (04) :541-557
[30]   Access to finance for innovators in the UK's environmental sector [J].
Demirel, Pelin ;
Parris, Stuart .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2015, 27 (07) :782-808