The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:101
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [21] Technological innovation for sustainable growth: An ontological perspective
    Cancino, Christian A.
    La Paz, Ariel I.
    Ramaprasad, Arkalgud
    Syn, Thant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 179 : 31 - 41
  • [22] Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs
    Cecere, Grazia
    Corrocher, Nicoletta
    Mancusi, Maria Luisa
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (01) : 285 - 302
  • [23] Monitoring: Which institutions matter?
    Chen, Xia
    Harford, Jarrad
    Li, Kai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 86 (02) : 279 - 305
  • [24] Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Yi, Na
    Zhang, Lu
    Li, Dayuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 304 - 311
  • [25] An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance
    Cox, P
    Brammer, S
    Millington, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2004, 52 (01) : 27 - 43
  • [26] Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises
    Dam, Lammertjan
    Scholtens, Bert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 118 (01) : 117 - 126
  • [27] The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D
    David, P
    Hitt, MA
    Gimeno, J
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (01) : 144 - 157
  • [28] Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand
    De Massis, Alfredo
    Audretsch, David
    Uhlaner, Lorraine
    Kammerlander, Nadine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (01) : 125 - 146
  • [29] What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods
    del Rio, Pablo
    Penasco, Cristina
    Romero-Jordan, Desiderio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2158 - 2170
  • [30] Policy Strategies to Promote Eco-Innovation
    del Rio, Pablo
    Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier
    Konnola, Totti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 14 (04) : 541 - 557