The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:101
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Innovation and Institutional Ownership
    Aghion, Philippe
    Van Reenen, John
    Zingales, Luigi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 277 - 304
  • [2] Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US
    Aguilera, RV
    Williams, CA
    Conley, JM
    Rupp, DE
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2006, 14 (03) : 147 - 158
  • [3] An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach
    Amor-Esteban, Victor
    Galindo-Villardon, Ma-Purificacion
    Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria
    David, Fatima
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (01) : 127 - 140
  • [4] Useful information for stakeholder engagement: A multivariate proposal of an Industrial Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Index
    Amor-Esteban, Victor
    Galindo-Villardon, Ma-Purificacion
    Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 26 (06) : 620 - 637
  • [5] Corporate governance and green innovation
    Amore, Mario Daniele
    Bennedsen, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 : 54 - 72
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, NEW LYRICS OLD FOLKS
  • [7] SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS
    ARELLANO, M
    BOND, S
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) : 277 - 297
  • [8] Large shareholder diversification, corporate risk taking, and the benefits of changing to differential voting rights
    Bauguess, Scott W.
    Slovin, Myron B.
    Sushka, Marie E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (04) : 1244 - 1253
  • [9] THE COMPOSITION OF BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AND STRATEGIC CONTROL - EFFECTS ON CORPORATE-STRATEGY
    BAYSINGER, B
    HOSKISSON, RE
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1990, 15 (01) : 72 - 87
  • [10] Becht Marco., 2003, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, V1A