The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:108
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[2]   Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Williams, CA ;
Conley, JM ;
Rupp, DE .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2006, 14 (03) :147-158
[3]   An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach [J].
Amor-Esteban, Victor ;
Galindo-Villardon, Ma-Purificacion ;
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria ;
David, Fatima .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (01) :127-140
[4]   Useful information for stakeholder engagement: A multivariate proposal of an Industrial Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Index [J].
Amor-Esteban, Victor ;
Galindo-Villardon, Ma-Purificacion ;
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 26 (06) :620-637
[5]   Corporate governance and green innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Bennedsen, Morten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 :54-72
[6]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[7]   Large shareholder diversification, corporate risk taking, and the benefits of changing to differential voting rights [J].
Bauguess, Scott W. ;
Slovin, Myron B. ;
Sushka, Marie E. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2012, 36 (04) :1244-1253
[8]   THE COMPOSITION OF BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AND STRATEGIC CONTROL - EFFECTS ON CORPORATE-STRATEGY [J].
BAYSINGER, B ;
HOSKISSON, RE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1990, 15 (01) :72-87
[9]  
Becht Marco., 2003, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, V1A
[10]   Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership [J].
Bena, Jan ;
Ferreira, Miguel A. ;
Matos, Pedro ;
Pires, Pedro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 126 (01) :122-146