Comparison Between 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Enterography for the Assessment of Disease Activity and Complications in Ileo-Colonic Crohn's Disease

被引:28
|
作者
Fiorino, Gionata [1 ]
Bonifacio, Cristiana [2 ]
Padrenostro, Mauro [2 ]
Sposta, Federica Mrakic [2 ]
Spinelli, Antonino [3 ]
Malesci, Alberto [1 ]
Balzarini, Luca [2 ]
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent [4 ,5 ]
Danese, Silvio [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Humanitas, IBD Ctr, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Humanitas, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS Humanitas, Dept Surg 3, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[4] INSERM, U954, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[5] Univ Lorraine, Univ Hosp Nancy Brabois, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
关键词
Crohn's disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; 3.0; Tesla; 1.5; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; MR ENTEROGRAPHY; CT ENTEROGRAPHY; TERMINAL ILEUM; ENTEROCLYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASOUND; SEVERITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-013-2781-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assess disease activity and severity in Crohn's disease (CD). Three-Tesla magnetic resonance (3T) increases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and reduces time of image acquisition (IAT). Whether 3T increases the accuracy of MRI in CD compared to 1.5T is unknown. We aimed to compare prospectively the accuracy of 3 and 1.5T in ileo-colonic CD patients. Twenty-six patients with ileo-colonic CD underwent 1.5 and 3T MR enterography at the same time. Ileocolonoscopy was the reference standard for luminal disease. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in evaluating six signs of active and complicated disease (localization, thickening, enhancement, strictures, entero-enteric fistulas, and ulcers) were calculated for both techniques. Three-Tesla resulted as sensitive, specific, and accurate as 1.5T in detecting disease location (accuracy 0.93 vs. 0.86), bowel wall thickening and enhancement (accuracy 0.92 vs. 0.80 for both parameters), strictures (accuracy 0.90 vs. 0.80) and entero-enteric fistulas (accuracy 0.92 vs. 0.92). 3T was superior to 1.5T in detecting ulcers (0.76 vs. 0.42, P < 0.05). SNR resulted higher in 3T, and IAT resulted shorter than 1.5. We found that 3T is equally accurate as 1.5T in evaluating ileo-colonic CD. Because of superiority in detecting mucosal ulcers, 3T should be preferred in patients with ileo-colonic CD.
引用
收藏
页码:3246 / 3255
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison Between 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Enterography for the Assessment of Disease Activity and Complications in Ileo-Colonic Crohn’s Disease
    Gionata Fiorino
    Cristiana Bonifacio
    Mauro Padrenostro
    Federica Mrakic Sposta
    Antonino Spinelli
    Alberto Malesci
    Luca Balzarini
    Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
    Silvio Danese
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2013, 58 : 3246 - 3255
  • [2] Reliability of Measuring Ileo-Colonic Disease Activity in Crohn's Disease by Magnetic Resonance Enterography
    Jairath, Vipul
    Ordas, Ingrid
    Zou, Guangyong
    Panes, Julian
    Stoker, Jaap
    Taylor, Stuart A.
    Santillan, Cynthia
    Horsthuis, Karin
    Samaan, Mark A.
    Shackelton, Lisa M.
    Stitt, Larry W.
    Hindryckx, Pieter
    Khanna, Reena
    Sandborn, William J.
    D'Haens, Geert
    Feagan, Brian G.
    Levesque, Barrett G.
    Rimola, Jordi
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2018, 24 (02) : 440 - 449
  • [3] Correlation between magnetic resonance enterography and ileo-colonoscopy for assessment of disease activity in terminal ileal Crohn's disease
    Kakkar, Chandan
    Singh, Arshdeep
    Mahajan, Ramit
    Midha, Vandana
    Goyal, Shriya
    Narang, Vikram
    Gupta, Kamini
    Singh, Dharmatma
    Bansal, Namita
    Saggar, Kavita
    Sood, Ajit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 41 (05) : 465 - 474
  • [4] Magnetic resonance enterography of Crohn's disease
    Naganuma, Makoto
    Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
    Kanai, Takanori
    Ogata, Haruhiko
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 9 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [5] Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity: Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Comparison with Clinical and Endoscopic Evaluations
    Minordi, Laura Maria
    Larosa, Luigi
    Papa, Alfredo
    Bordonaro, Veronica
    Lopetuso, Loris
    Holleran, Grainne
    Gasbarrini, Antonio
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2019, 28 (02) : 213 - 224
  • [6] Correlation between magnetic resonance enterography and ileo-colonoscopy for assessment of disease activity in terminal ileal Crohn’s disease
    Chandan Kakkar
    Arshdeep Singh
    Ramit Mahajan
    Vandana Midha
    Shriya Goyal
    Vikram Narang
    Kamini Gupta
    Dharmatma Singh
    Namita Bansal
    Kavita Saggar
    Ajit Sood
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2022, 41 : 465 - 474
  • [7] Prospective Comparison of Computed Tomography Enterography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Assessment of Disease Activity and Complications in Ileocolonic Crohn's Disease
    Fiorino, G.
    Bonifacio, C.
    Peyrin-Biroulet, L.
    Minuti, F.
    Repici, A.
    Spinelli, A.
    Fries, W.
    Balzarini, L.
    Montorsi, M.
    Malesci, A.
    Danese, S.
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2011, 17 (05) : 1073 - 1080
  • [8] Manifestations of small bowel disease in pediatric Crohn's disease on magnetic resonance enterography
    Torkzad, Michael R.
    Ullberg, Ulla
    Nystrom, Niklas
    Blomqvist, Lennart
    Hellstrom, Per
    Fagerberg, Ulrika L.
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2012, 18 (03) : 520 - 528
  • [9] Magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn's disease: a comparison with the findings at surgery
    Fallis, S. A.
    Murphy, P.
    Sinha, R.
    Hawker, P.
    Gladman, L.
    Busby, K.
    Sanders, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (10) : 1273 - 1280
  • [10] Can Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) replace ileo-colonoscopy for evaluating disease activity in Crohn's disease?
    Varyani, Fumi
    Samuel, Sunil
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 38-39