Which types of commodity price information are more useful for predicting US stock market volatility?

被引:37
|
作者
Liang, Chao [1 ]
Ma, Feng [1 ]
Li, Ziyang [2 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Commodity futures volatility; Stock market volatility; Factor analysis; Principal component analysis; OIL PRICE; CRUDE-OIL; REALIZED VOLATILITY; FUTURES-MARKETS; LONG MEMORY; SAMPLE; SPOT; COMBINATION; RETURN; PREDICTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to investigate which types of commodity price information are more useful for predicting US stock market realized volatility (RV) in a data-rich word. The standard predictive regression framework and monthly RV data are used to explore the RV predictability of commodity futures for the next-month RV on S&P 500 spot index. We utilize principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA) to extract the common factors for each type and all types of commodity futures. Our results indicate that the futures volatility information of grains and softs has a significant predictive ability in forecasting the RV of the S&P 500. In addition, the FA method can yield better forecasts than the PCA and average methods in most cases. Further analysis shows that the volatility information of grains and softs exhibits higher informativeness during recessions and pre-crises. Finally, the forecasts of the five combination methods and different out-of-sample periods confirm our results are robust
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 650
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of US implied volatility index in forecasting Chinese stock market volatility: Evidence from HAR models
    Xiao, Jihong
    Wen, Fenghua
    Zhao, Yupei
    Wang, Xiong
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 74 : 311 - 333
  • [42] Dynamic volatility spillovers and investment strategies between the Chinese stock market and commodity markets
    Wen, Fenghua
    Cao, Jiahui
    Liu, Zhen
    Wang, Xiong
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 76
  • [43] The information content of US stock market factors
    Elgammal, Mohammed M.
    Ahmed, Fatma Ehab
    McMillan, David G.
    STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 37 (02) : 323 - 346
  • [44] TIME-FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPILLOVER EFFECT OF OIL PRICE VOLATILITY ON CHINA'S COMMODITY FUTURES MARKET
    Zhu, Jingran
    Song, Qinghua
    Khouri, Samer
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2021, 20 (01): : 200 - 218
  • [45] Forecasting stock market volatility: The sum of the parts is more than the whole
    Gao, Shang
    Zhang, Zhikai
    Wang, Yudong
    Zhang, Yaojie
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 55
  • [46] Less is more? New evidence from stock market volatility predictability
    Lu, Fei
    Ma, Feng
    Guo, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 89
  • [47] The asymmetric effects of oil price shocks on the US stock market
    Rahman, Sajjadur
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 105
  • [48] Energy price shocks and stock market volatility in an energy-importing country
    Son, Jaemin
    Ryu, Doojin
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [49] Applications of nonferrous metal price volatility to prediction of China's stock market
    Peng, Die-feng
    Wang, Jian-xin
    Rao, Yu-lei
    TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2014, 24 (02) : 597 - 604
  • [50] Decomposed oil price shocks and GCC stock market sector returns and volatility
    Al-Fayoumi, Nedal
    Bouri, Elie
    Abuzayed, Bana
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 126