The European Medicines Agency review of vemurafenib (Zelboraf®) for the treatment of adult patients with BRAF 600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Summary of the scientific assessment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use

被引:50
作者
Dias, Silvy da Rocha [1 ]
Salmonson, Tomas [2 ]
van Zwieten-Boot, Barbara [3 ]
Jonsson, Bertil [2 ]
Marchetti, Serena [4 ]
Schellens, Jan H. M. [4 ,5 ]
Giuliani, Rosa [1 ]
Pignatti, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] European Med Agcy, London E14 4HB, England
[2] Med Prod Agcy, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Med Evaluat Board, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Vemurafenib; Melanoma; EMA; European Medicines; Agency; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; PHASE-III; DACARBAZINE; EXPERIENCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The applicant company Roche Registration Ltd. submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) an application for marketing authorisation for vemurafenib. Vemurafenib is a low molecular weight, orally available, inhibitor of oncogenic V600 BRAF serine-threonine kinase. Mutations in the BRAF gene which substitute the valine at amino acid position 600 constitutively activate BRAF proteins, which will drive cell proliferation in the absence of growth factors. Results from a phase 3 trial (N = 675) comparing vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily (taken either with or without food) to standard treatment dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma were submitted. The study met its primary efficacy objective after an interim analysis of overall survival. Patients were allowed to cross-over to the experimental arm following disclosure of the study results after the first interim analysis. In the update of the analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months versus 13.2 months for DTIC and vemurafenib, respectively (HR = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54, 0.84; cut-off 3 October 2011). Based on the updated analysis, the CHMP concluded that a survival benefit over DTIC had been convincingly demonstrated, in the overall population. The follow-up was considered sufficiently mature with close to 50% of the events observed. The most common side effects (affecting more than 30% of patients) in vemurafenib treated patients included arthralgia, fatigue, rash, photosensitivity reaction, nausea, alopecia and pruritus. Some patients treated with vemurafenib developed cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma which was readily treated by local surgery. The objective of this paper is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the European Union (EU). The full scientific assessment report and product information, including the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), are available on the EMA website (www.ema.europa.eu). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1654 / 1661
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Bcl-2 antisense (oblimersen sodium) plus dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: The oblimersen melanoma study group
    Bedikian, Agop Y.
    Millward, Michael
    Pehamberger, Hubert
    Conry, Robert
    Gore, Martin
    Trefzer, Uwe
    Pavlick, Anna C.
    DeConti, Ronald
    Hersh, Evan M.
    Hersey, Peter
    Kirkwood, John M.
    Haluska, Frank G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (29) : 4738 - 4745
  • [2] Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation
    Chapman, Paul B.
    Hauschild, Axel
    Robert, Caroline
    Haanen, John B.
    Ascierto, Paolo
    Larkin, James
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Garbe, Claus
    Testori, Alessandro
    Maio, Michele
    Hogg, David
    Lorigan, Paul
    Lebbe, Celeste
    Jouary, Thomas
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Ribas, Antoni
    O'Day, Steven J.
    Sosman, Jeffrey A.
    Kirkwood, John M.
    Eggermont, Alexander M. M.
    Dreno, Brigitte
    Nolop, Keith
    Li, Jiang
    Nelson, Betty
    Hou, Jeannie
    Lee, Richard J.
    Flaherty, Keith T.
    McArthur, Grant A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (26) : 2507 - 2516
  • [3] Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma
    Chapman, PB
    Einhorn, LH
    Meyers, ML
    Saxman, S
    Destro, AN
    Panageas, KS
    Begg, CB
    Agarwala, SS
    Schuchter, LM
    Ernstoff, MS
    Houghton, AN
    Kirkwood, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) : 2745 - 2751
  • [4] FALKSON G, 1972, CANCER CHEMOTH REP 1, V56, P671
  • [5] The European Medicines Agency review of ipilimumab (Yervoy) for the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma in adults who have received prior therapy: Summary of the scientific assessment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
    Hanaizi, Zahra
    van Zwieten-Boot, Barbara
    Calvo, Gonzalo
    Sancho Lopez, Arantxa
    van Dartel, Maaike
    Camarero, Jorge
    Abadie, Eric
    Pignatti, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [6] HILL GJ, 1981, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V47, P2556, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19810601)47:11<2556::AID-CNCR2820471107>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-J
  • [8] LUCE JK, 1970, CANCER CHEMOTH REP 1, V54, P119
  • [9] Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma
    Middleton, MR
    Grob, JJ
    Aaronson, N
    Fierlbeck, G
    Tilgen, W
    Seiter, S
    Gore, M
    Aamdal, S
    Cebon, J
    Coates, A
    Dreno, B
    Henz, M
    Schadendorf, D
    Kapp, A
    Weiss, J
    Fraass, U
    Statkevich, P
    Muller, M
    Thatcher, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (01) : 158 - 166
  • [10] Estimating the world cancer burden: GLOBOCAN 2000
    Parkin, DM
    Bray, F
    Ferlay, J
    Pisani, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 94 (02) : 153 - 156