Informing Women and Their Physicians about Recommendations for Adjunct Breast MRI Screening: A Cohort Study

被引:9
作者
Brinton, John T. [1 ]
Barke, Lora D. [2 ]
Freivogel, Mary E. [2 ]
Talley, Tiffany C. [2 ]
Lexin, Michelle D. [2 ]
Drew, Alicia L. [2 ]
Beam, Rachel B. [2 ]
Glueck, Deborah H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Radiol Imaging Associates & Invis Sally Jobe Brea, Lone Tree, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
HIGH-RISK; FAMILIAL RISK; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; MUTATION; BRCA1; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/10410236.2016.1278499
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
It is unclear how best to communicate recommendations for breast cancer screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography for women at high risk. This study compares the rates of breast MRI screening for two different methods of communication. The retrospective IRB-approved cohort study was conducted at Invision Sally Jobe Breast Centers (ISJBC). ISJBC provided Gail model risk assessment to all women presenting for screening mammography. Women with scores 19.6% were considered to be high risk. Over 2years, ISJBC used two different methods to inform women at elevated lifetime risk and their physicians about recommendations for adjunct MRI screening (N=561, mean age=52years, s.d.=8.7). During Window A, information was sent to referring physicians as a part of the dictated imaging report, while later, in Window B, the information was sent to referring physicians as well as to the women themselves in a letter. Analyses were stratified by mammography screening frequency. One-time screeners presented in only Window A or Window B. Repeat screeners came both in Window A and in Window B. Breast MRI screening rates were significantly higher in Window B than in Window A (one-time screeners, N=459, 9.8% vs. 14.4%, p=0.047; repeat screeners, N=102, 0% vs. 6.9%, p=0.016). Although an observational study cannot assess causality, direct communication of risk-based recommendations for adjunct breast MRI screening to women and to their referring physicians was associated with an increased rate of screening breast MRI completion at the same clinic at which the women underwent mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 495
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AHRQ PUBLICATION
[2]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[3]   Reasons Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer Refuse Breast MR Imaging Screening: ACRIN 6666 [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Lehrer, Daniel E. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Gabrielli, Glenna J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (01) :79-87
[4]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[5]   Breast Cancer Risk Reduction, Version 2.2015 [J].
Bevers, Therese B. ;
Ward, John H. ;
Arun, Banu K. ;
Colditz, Graham A. ;
Cowan, Kenneth H. ;
Daly, Mary B. ;
Garber, Judy E. ;
Gemignani, Mary L. ;
Gradishar, William J. ;
Jordan, Judith A. ;
Korde, Larissa A. ;
Kounalakis, Nicole ;
Krontiras, Helen ;
Kumar, Shicha ;
Kurian, Allison ;
Laronga, Christine ;
Layman, Rachel M. ;
Loftus, Loretta S. ;
Mahoney, Martin C. ;
Merajver, Sofia D. ;
Meszoely, Ingrid M. ;
Mortimer, Joanne ;
Newman, Lisa ;
Pritchard, Elizabeth ;
Pruthi, Sandhya ;
Seewaldt, Victoria ;
Specht, Michelle C. ;
Visvanathan, Kale ;
Wallace, Anne ;
Bergman, Mary Ann ;
Kumar, Rashmi .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (07) :880-915
[6]   Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in 64,659 Women at a Single High-Volume Mammography Clinic [J].
Brinton, John T. ;
Barke, Lora D. ;
Freivogel, Mary E. ;
Jackson, Stacy ;
O'Donnell, Colin I. ;
Glueck, Deborah H. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) :95-99
[7]   Risk models in genetic epidemiology [J].
Claus, EB .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (06) :589-601
[8]  
D'Orsi C.J., 2003, Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas
[9]   Gail model for prediction of absolute risk of invasive breast cancer: Independent evaluation in the Florence-European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort [J].
Decarli, Adriano ;
Calza, Stefano ;
Masala, Giovanna ;
Specchia, Claudia ;
Palli, Domenico ;
Gail, Mitchell H. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (23) :1686-1693
[10]   Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging Recommendations and Outcomes in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer [J].
Ehsani, Sima ;
Strigel, Roberta M. ;
Pettke, Erica ;
Wilke, Lee ;
Tevaarwerk, Amye J. ;
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Wisinski, Kari B. .
Breast Journal, 2015, 21 (03) :246-253